VERKLE-FRI: A NOVEL ARCHITECTURE FOR STATELESS AND QUANTUM-RESISTANT VECTOR COMMITMENTS
Abstract
The subject matter of the article is the cryptographic integrity of digital authentication systems facing quantum computing threats, specifically focusing on post-quantum alternatives and efficient authenticated data structures. The goal is to design and formally analyze VERKLE-FRI—a hybrid architecture synthesizing Verkle tree proof-size reduction with FRI-based quantum-resistant commitments, establishing a scalable, stateless, and quantum-secure framework. The tasks are: analyze limitations of hash-based signatures and Merkle trees; evaluate polynomial commitment schemes (KZG, Bulletproofs, FRI, lattice-based); propose a hybrid Verkle-FRI design; develop a formal security proof against classical and quantum adversaries; execute complexity analysis with concrete implementation parameters. The methods used are: theoretical cryptographic analysis, formal security modeling via reductionist proofs, algebraic methods over finite fields, polynomial interpolation, random oracle model, FRI protocol with DEEP-FRI optimization, Merkle trees, vector commitments, and asymptotic complexity analysis. The following results were achieved: a novel architecture where Verkle node vectors are polynomial-encoded, committed via Merkle trees over FRI codewords, and verified through FRI with out-of-domain sampling. A formal proof establishes λ-bit quantum security using 2λ-bit hash functions. Complexity yields proof size O(λ log² N), prover time O(λ N log N), and verifier time O(λ log N). Concrete 128-bit quantum parameters include SHA3-512, field size ≈2²⁵⁵, branching factor 256, and 128 FRI rounds, achieving soundness error ≤2⁻¹²⁷. For a concrete benchmark authenticating 2²⁶ elements, a traditional Merkle proof requires ≈0.8 KB, whereas our VERKLE-FRI proof requires ≈180 KB. While larger, this provides quantum resistance and eliminates the trusted setup, a critical trade-off for long-term security. Conclusions. Scientific novelty consists in: 1) the first hybrid Verkle-FRI architecture replacing pairing-based assumptions with hash-based proximity testing; 2) a formal security proof reducing security to hash collision resistance and FRI soundness; 3) quantified efficiency-security trade-offs; 4) a viable pathway for quantum-resistant infrastructure in blockchains, software distribution, and government communications.
Keywords
References
Li, L., Lu, X., & Wang, K. Hash-based signature revisited. Cybersecurity, 2022, vol. 5, no. 1, article no. 13. DOI: 10.1186/s42400-022-00117-w.
Pacurar, C. M., Bocu, R., & Iavich, M. An analysis of existing hash-based post-quantum signature schemes. Symmetry, 2025, vol. 17, no. 6, article no. 919. DOI: 10.3390/sym17060919.
Iavich, M., Kuchukhidze, T., & Bocu, R. A post-quantum digital signature using Verkle trees and lattices. Symmetry, 2023, vol. 15, no. 12, article no. 2165. DOI: 10.3390/sym15122165.
NIST. Status Report on the Fourth Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process. NIST IR 8454, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2024. DOI: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8454.
Thoma, J. P., Hartlief, D., & Güneysu, T. Agile acceleration of stateful hash-based signatures in hardware. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 2024, vol. 23, no. 2, article no. 29. DOI: 10.1145/3631534.
Fenzi, G., Moghaddas, H., & Nguyen, N. K. Lattice-based polynomial commitments: towards asymptotic and concrete efficiency. Journal of Cryptology, 2024, vol. 37, no. 4, article no. 31. DOI: 10.1007/s00145-024-09511-8.
Iavich, M., & Kapalova, N. Asymmetric post-quantum digital signature scheme with k-ary Verkle trees. Symmetry, 2025, vol. 17, no. 3, article no. 437. DOI: 10.3390/sym17030437.
Nutu, M., Akhalaia, G., Bocu, R., & Iavich, M. An extended survey concerning the vector commitments. Applied Sciences, 2025, vol. 15, no. 17, article no. 9510. DOI: 10.3390/app15179510.
Algazy, K. T., Sakan, K. S., Nyssanbayeva, S. E., & Khompysh, A. Polynomial commitment in a Verkle tree based on a non-positional polynomial notation. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 885–905. DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2025.065085.
Ben-Sasson, E., Bentov, I., Horesh, Y., & Riabzev, M. Fast Reed-Solomon interactive oracle proofs of proximity. Proceedings of the 45th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2018), Prague, Czech Republic, July 9–13, 2018, pp. 14:1–14:17. DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2018.14.
Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Riabzev, M., Spooner, N., Virza, M., & Ward, N. P. Aurora: transparent succinct arguments for R1CS. Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2019, Darmstadt, Germany, May 19–23, 2019, pp. 103–128. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17656-3_4.
Chiesa, A., Ojha, D., & Spooner, N. Fractal: post-quantum and transparent recursive proofs from holography. Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2020, Zagreb, Croatia, May 10–14, 2020, pp. 769–793. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45724-2_26.
Guo, Y., Liu, X., Huang, K., Qu, W., Tao, T., & Zhang, J. DeepFold: efficient multilinear polynomial commitment from Reed-Solomon code and its application to zero-knowledge proofs. Proceedings of the 34th USENIX Security Symposium, Seattle, WA, USA, August 13–15, 2025, pp. 3497–3514. Available at: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity25/presentation/guo (accessed March 13, 2026).
Ben-Sasson, E., Goldberg, L., Kopparty, S., & Saraf, S. DEEP-FRI: sampling outside the box improves soundness. Proceedings of the 11th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2020), Seattle, WA, USA, January 12–14, 2020, article no. 75, pp. 75:1–75:29. DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2020.75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2026.2.17
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
