Method of ranking athletes in a decision support system in the process of preliminary selection of players

Yelyzaveta Hnatchuk, Tetiana Hovorushchenko, Alina Hnatchuk

Abstract


The topic of the article is the method of ranking athletes in a decision support system in the process of preliminary selection of players. The purpose of the is to develop an athlete ranking method that enables the integration of all available information types, facilitating informed decision-making, as selection accuracy directly impacts the quality of the resulting team. Research objectives: investigate the information types utilized in athlete ranking and identify appropriate methods for data representation and processing; to develop a method based on specific metrics, production rules, weighting coefficients, and an artificial neural network (ANN) model to generate player ratings within a DSS; to conduct an experiment to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Research results: The article proposes a hybrid ranking method that integrates a deterministic component (IF-THEN production rules) with an adaptive ANN model. This architecture combines expert heuristic knowledge with automated data-driven learning, ensuring both decision explainability and the model's robustness in complex conditions. At the first level, the system ranks candidates using predefined logical rules derived from expert assessments by coaches and analysts. These rules process formalized metrics such as physical development, fitness, and competition history, enabling initial screening based on basic functional suitability criteria for a specific position. At the second level, an ANN module is integrated to perform a multidimensional analysis of the players' numerical characteristics. By identifying latent non-linear dependencies between tactical and technical action indicators and anthropometric variables, the model provides a predictive assessment of overall potential. This approach is particularly effective in scenarios where manually formulated rules cannot capture the complex interdependencies between variables. The final output integrates a binary classification (fit/unfit) with a quantitative rating generated by the neural network. These results can be mapped to a formalized scale for further ranking or utilized as primary input for final coaching decisions. This structure ensures an optimal balance between interpretability, accuracy, and adaptability within the volleyball player selection process. Conclusions: The scientific novelty lies in combining a structured system of TTA indicators with role-specific weighting obtained through expert consensus, allowing for contextual adaptation.  Additionally, the integration of a neural network component to identify latent dependencies between performance indicators dynamically represents a novel approach for short-term selection in volleyball. Further research will focus on developing adaptive player models and optimizing selection processes to enhance the effectiveness of decision-making within the DSS.

Keywords


decision support system; decision-making; decision-making criteria; ranking method; rules; artificial neural networks; preliminary selection of players

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hovorushchenko, T., Hnatchuk, Ye., Herts, A., & Onyshko, O. Intelligent Information Technology for Supporting the Medical Decision-Making Considering the Legal Basis. CEUR-WS, 2021, vol. 2853, pp. 72-82. Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2853/paper4.pdf (accessed 12.07.2024).

Ati, A., Bouchet, P., & Jeddou, R. B. Using multi-criteria decision-making and machine learning for football player selection and performance prediction: A systematic review. Data Science and Management, 2024, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 79-88.

Kolbowicz, M., Nowak, M., & Więckowski, J. A multi-criteria system for performance assessment and support decision-making based on the example of Premier League top football strikers. Phys Act Rev, 2024, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 121-42.

Román-Gallego, J. Á., Pérez-Delgado, M. L., Cofiño-Gavito, F. J., & Conde, M. Á., Rodríguez-Rodrigo R. Analysis and parameterization of sports performance: A case study of soccer. Applied Sciences, 2023, vol. 13, iss. 23, article no. 12767.

Oliveira, M. S., & Steffen, V. MCDM and soccer: A systematic review of key aspects, trends, and future perspectives. J. Oper. Strateg Analytics, 2025, vol. 3, iss. 02, pp. 80-95.

Schelling, X., & Robertson, S. A development framework for decision support systems in high-performance sport. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 2020, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 1-23.

Hovorushchenko, T., Hnatchuk, Y., Hnatchuk, A. & Fehyr, O. Decision Support System For The Coaching Staff in the Process of Preliminary Selection of Players. 2023 IEEE 18th International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technologies (CSIT), 2023, pp. 1-4. DOI: 10.1109/CSIT61576.2023. 10324119.

Nisel, S., & Özdemir, M. Analytic hierarchy process & analytic network process in sport: a comprehensive literature review. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2016, vol. 8, iss. 3. DOI: 10.13033/ijahp.v8i3.448.

Hu, Z.-H., Zhou, J.-X., Zhang, M.-J. & Zhao, Y. Methods for ranking college sports coaches based on data envelopment analysis and PageRank. Expert Systems, 2015, vol. 32. DOI: 10.1111/exsy.12108.

Urbaniak, K., Wątróbski, J. & Sałabun, W. Identification of Players Ranking in E-Sport. Applied Sciences, 2020, vol. 10, iss. 19, article no. 6768. DOI: 10.3390/app10196768.

Kai, G. Evaluation research on competitive ability of volleyball player based on fuzzy set of evaluation index and weight. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 20, article no. 2547. DOI: 10.3923/jas.2014.2547.2551.

Claudino, J. G., Capanema, D. O., de Souza, T. V., Serrão, J. C., Machado Pereira, A. C., & Nassis, G. P. Current Approaches to the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Injury Risk Assessment and Performance Prediction in Team Sports: a Systematic Review. Sports Medicine – Open, 2019, vol. 5, article no. 28. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-019-0202-3.

Vavrek, R. An Analysis of Usage of a Multi-Criteria Approach in an Athlete Evaluation: An Evidence of NHL Attackers. Mathematics, 2021, vol. 9, iss. 12, article no. 1399. DOI: 10.3390/math9121399.

Yalcin, A. S., Kilic, H. S., & Delen, D. The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, vol. 174, article no. 121193. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121193.

Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M., & Kumar, V. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis in sustainable manufacturing decision making. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2020, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 202–225. DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2020.1866708.

Kahraman, C., Onar, S. C. K., Oztaysi, B., Seker, S., & Karasan, A. Integration of fuzzy AHP with other fuzzy multicriteria methods: a state of the art survey. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing, 2020, vol. 35, iss. 1-2, pp. 61-92. Available at: https://research.itu.edu.tr/en/publications/integration-of-fuzzy-ahp-with-other-fuzzy-multicriteria-methods-a/ (accessed 05.08.2024).

Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., & Earl, C. A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, vol. 161, article no. 113738. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738.

Uzun, B., Taiwo, M., Syidanova, A., & Uzun Ozsahin, D. The Technique For Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental and Civil Engineering. Professional Practice in Earth Sciences, 2020, Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64765-0_4.

Teng, Ye., Wang, Y., & You, H. The risk evaluation and management of the sports service supply chain by introducing fuzzy comprehensive appraisal and artificial intelligence technology. Expert Systems, 2024, vol. 41, iss. 5, article no. e13279. DOI: 10.1111/exsy.13279.

An, P. Fuzzy Decision Support Systems to Improve the Effectiveness of Training Programmes in the Field of Sports Fitness. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2024, vol. 17, article no. 168. DOI: 10.1007/s44196-024-00555-z.

Wang, L. Analysis of sports training and load forecasting using an improved artificial neural network. Software Computing, 2023, vol. 27, pp. 14515-14527. DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-09114-8.

Das, N. R., Ghosh, S., Mukherjee, I., & Paul, G. Adoption of a ranking based indexing method for the cricket teams. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, vol. 213, part A, article no. 118796. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118796.

Schelling, X., Spencer, B., Azalbert, V., Alonso-Perez-Chao, E., Sosa, C., & Robertson, S. Decision Support Systems for Time Series in Sport: Literature Review and Applied Example of Changepoint-Based Most Demanding Scenario Analysis in Basketball. Applied Sciences, 2025, vol. 15, iss. 19, article no. 10575. DOI: 10.3390/app151910575.

Schelling, X., Alonso-Perez-Chao, E., & Robertson, S. Implementation of a Decision Support System to Enhance Movement Proficiency Assessment in Sport. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 2025, vol. 10, no. 1, article no. 86. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk10010086.

Mănescu, D. C,, & Mănescu, A. M. Artificial Intelligence in the Selection of Top-Performing Athletes for Team Sports: A Proof-of-Concept Predictive Modeling Study. Applied Sciences, 2025, vol. 15, no. 18, article no. 9918. DOI: 10.3390/app15189918.

Sugiyono, S., & Arpinda, A. Decision Tree-Based Potential Athletics Athlete Selection System for PASI DKI Jakarta. International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS), 2025, vol. 5, iss. 3, pp. 988–997. DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v5i3.5242.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2026.1.05

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.