APPROACHES TO DETERMINING THE PLASTIC ZONE NEAR THE CRACK TIP IN FATIGUE LIFE CALCULATIONS
Abstract
This paper reviews the primary approaches to assessing the plastic zone formed in the vicinity of a fatigue crack tip, and analyses how this is considered in fatigue life calculations for aircraft structures. This topic is relevant because most airframe components experience high-cycle, variable-amplitude loading, and the presence of cracks or stress concentrators can induce local plastic deformation even at relatively low nominal stress levels. Within the framework of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM), stresses exhibit a singularity at the crack tip; that is, they increase infinitely as the crack tip is approached. In real structural materials, however, such an increase is limited by reaching the yield strength, resulting in the formation of a plastic zone. The size and shape of this zone affect the validity of applying LEFM parameters. The paper analyzes the stress state near the crack tip, the role of the stress intensity factor (SIF), and the conditions for the onset of plastic deformation according to the Mises and Tresca criteria. It also considers the differences between plane stress and plane strain states. Particular focus is given to the classical analytical models of Irwin, Leonov–Panasyuk–Dugdale and their modifications. The analysis includes experimental and numerical methods for refining the plastic zone, such as microhardness measurements, metallographic etching, digital image correlation (DIC), and the finite element method (FEM). The influence of the plastic zone on fatigue crack growth is considered, including the distinction between monotonic and cyclic plastic zones, plasticity-induced crack closure, and the effects of overload, underload, and load interaction in a loading spectrum. Approaches that account for the effects of local plastic deformation both at the crack tip and in the crack wake are critically evaluated, including the Wheeler, Willenborg, Generalized Willenborg, Modified Generalized Willenborg, Hsu, FASTRAN and strip-yield models. The inclusion of the plastic zone in regulatory and reference documents is also discussed. It is demonstrated that the Irwin plastic zone correction method is the most widely used approach in engineering practice for accounting for the plastic zone. It is also established that plastic zone assessment is an important component of analysing the fatigue life and residual strength of aircraft structures. This makes it possible to determine the limits of LEFM applicability, justify the selection of appropriate calculation model, account for the influence of load history and improve the reliability of durability prediction for cracked structural elements.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Українська)References
Janssen, M. Fracture mechanics. London, Spon Press, 2004. 365 p.
Anderson, Ted L. Fracture mechanics: Fundamentals and applications. Boca Raton, Taylor & Francis, 2005. 621 p.
Wheeler, O. E. Spectrum Loading and Crack Growth. Journal of Basic Engineering, 1972, vol. 94, iss. 1, pp. 181–186. DOI: 10.1115/1.3425362
Willenborg, J., Engle, R. M., Wood, H. A. A Crack Growth Retardation Model Using an Effective Stress Concept. Fort Belvoir, Defense
Technical Information Center, 1971. 22p.
DOI: 10.21236/ada956517
Gallagher, J. P., Hughes, T. F. Influence of Yield Strength on Overload Affected Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior in 4340 Steel. Fort Belvoir, Defense Technical Information Center, 1974. 38p. DOI: 10.21236/ad0787655
Deiters, T.W. Hsu Model. TWD03ER009-1. Kennesaw GA, Engineering Inc, 2004. 58 p.
Newman, J.C. Jr. FASTRAN-II: A Fatigue Crack Growth Structural Analysis Program. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1992. 103p.
Vasco-Olmo, J. M., James, M. N., Christo-pher, C. J.. Patterson, E. A., Díaz, F. A. Assessment of crack tip plastic zone size and shape and its influence on crack tip shielding. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2016, vol. 39, iss. 8, pp. 969–981. DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12436
Harmain, G. A., Provan J. W. Fatigue crack-tip plasticity revisited – The issue of shape addressed. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 1997, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 63–79. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8442(96)00036-5
Jia, Y.J., Shi, M.X., Zhao, Y., Liu, B. Better Estimation of Plastic Zone Size at the Crack Tip Beyond Irwin's Model. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, vol. 80, no. 5. 6 p. DOI:10.1115/1.4023642
Dugdale, D. S. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1960, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 100–104. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2
Leonov, M. Ia, Panasiuk, V. V. Razvytye melchaishykh treshchyn v tverdom tele [Development of the smallest cracks in a solid body]. Prykladnaia mekhanyka, 1959, vol. 5, no.4, pp. 391-401.
Park, K., Paulino, G. H. Cohesive Zone Models: A Critical Review of Traction-Separation Relationships Across Fracture Surfaces. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2011, vol. 64, iss. 6. 20 p. DOI: 10.1115/1.4023110
Ferdjani, H, Marigo, J. Application of the Dugdale model to a mixed mode loading of a semi-infinite cracked structure. European Journal of Mechanics, 2015, vol. 53, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.02.006
Christopher, C. J., James, M. N., Patterson, E. A. Tee, K. F. Towards a new model of crack tip stress field. International Journal of Fracture, 2007, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 361–371. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-008-9209-3
James, M. N., Christopher, C. J., Lu, Y., Patterson, E. A. Local crack plasticity and its influences on the global elastic stress field. International Journal of Fatigue, 2013, vol. 46, pp. 4–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.015
Uguz, A., Martin, J. W. Plastic zone size measurement techniques for metallic materials. Materials Characterization, 1996, vol. 37, iss. 2-3, pp. 105–118. DOI: 10.1016/s1044-5803(96)00074-5
Nowell, D., de Matos, P. F. P. Application of digital image correlation to the investigation of crack closure following overloads. Procedia Engineering, 2010, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1035–1043. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.112
Li, J., Yang, B., Wang, S., James, M. N., Xiao, S., Zhu, T., Yang, G. Modified Model of Crack Tip Stress Field Considering Dislocation Slip Accumulation and Crack Tip Blunting. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, vol. 36, no. 1. 14 p. DOI: 10.1186/s10033-023-00875-9
Rahgozar, R., Saffari, H., Tabatabaei, R. Finite Element Analysis of Plasticity- Induced Fatigue Crack Closure with Singular Element. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2007, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 357–361. DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2007.357.361
Beden, S. M., Abdullah, S., Ariffin, A. K. Review of Fatigue Crack Propagation Models for Metallic Components. European Journal of Scientific Research, 2009, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 364–397.
Elber, W. The Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure. ASTM STP 486, 1971, pp. 230–242.
Newman, J. C. A Crack Opening Stress Equation for Fatigue Crack Growth. International Journal of Fracture, 1984. 5 p.
Newman, J. C. Jr. FASTRAN-II: A Fatigue Crack Growth Structural Analysis Program. NASA-TM-104159. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1992. 68 p.
ESDU 80036 Introduction to the Use of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics in Estimating Fatigue Crack Growth Rates and Residual Strength of Components, 2003. 29 p.
ASTM E561-23 Standard Test Method for K-R Curve Determination. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2023. 18 p.
BS 7910-19 Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. British Standard, London, 2019. 306 p.
Anderson, T. L., Osage, D. A. API 579: a comprehensive fitness-for-service guide. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2000, vol. 77, iss. 14-15, pp. 953–963. DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(01)00018-7
Wood, H. A., Engle Jr, R. M. Damage Tolerant Design Handbook: Guidelines for the Analysis and Design of Damage Tolerant Aircraft Structures. Structures and Dynamics Division, 1979. 447 p
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2026.4.03
