TIME DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMIC REFORMS

One of the integral methods for assessing resource efficiency is the adjustment of net savings, which includes indicators reflecting consumption of fixed capital, depreciation, education costs, environmental protection costs and the value of specially protected natural areas (PAs), depletion of natural capital and damage to public health from habitat pollution. The purpose of the research is to assess the contribution of protected areas based on the value of their ecosystem services, taking into account the consideration of regional destinations of tourist and recreational services. The object of the research is the most significant specially protected natural objects of the Komi Republic. Methodological basis. To determine the economic value of regulating and cultural services, the methods of market indirect assessment, compensatory costs and travel expenses were used. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the tourist destination on recreational PAs resources was based on a combination of the target approach, including indicators of the contribution of the destination to the GRP, the growth of tourist flow, value added and an assessment of the volume of network interaction of tourism subjects. The hypothesis was the assumption of reducing the contribution of the value of protected areas to the region's GRP over a long study period, which means low efficiency in the use of natural capital. The statement of basic materials. Received the contribution of protected areas to gross savings, GRP for the period 2000-2018. An approach to assessing the tourist and recreational services of protected areas has been implemented, taking into account the implementation of a regional / local destination, integrated logistics, tourism resources and products aimed at reducing transaction costs, increasing production capacity, volume and quality of investment, reducing losses in the value chain and distribution, improving the quality of the tourist product, reducing the cost of improving and developing new products. The quality of the functioning of the food chain of destination has been determined. The originality of the research lies in the comprehensive consideration of protected areas as a resource for the regional economy. Conclusion of the research. The analysis carried out and the calculations carried out will make it possible in the future to determine the reserves and ways to achieve eco-efficiency in the use of the natural capital of the territories of special protection and development of tourism in PAs.

specially protected natural areas, ecosystem services, tourist and recreational destinations, efficiency, ecological tourism

World Bank. 2017. The Little Green Data Book 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0.

The 2017 Atlas of Sustainable Development Goals: A new visual guide to data and development. Retrevied from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/

Resource efficiency: a report on the International Resource Panel: March 2017, 167. Retrevied from: http://www.unep.org/

IRP (2017). Assessing global re-source use: A system approach to resource ef-ficiency and pollution reduction. A Report of the International Resource Panel. United Na-tions Environment Program. Nairobi, Kenya. Retrevied from: http://www.resourcepanel.org/

Bobylev, S. N. & Minakov, V. S. & Solovyeva S. V. & Tretyakov, V. V. (2012). Ecological-economic index of regions of the Russian Federation. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), RIA Novosti, 152.

Zomonova, E. M. (2015). The strategy of transition to a "green" economy: experience and methods of measurement: an analytical review. Novosibirsk: GPNTB SB RAS, 283.

Korobitsyn, B. A. (2015). Methodical approach to accounting for the depletion of natural resources, changes in the state of the environment and human capital in the gross regional product. Economy of the region, 3, 77–88.

Ryumina, E. V. (2016). Ecological Aspects of Quality of Life. Economics of the region, 12, 4, 1113–1122.

Belik, I. S. & Pryakhin, D. A. (2013). Socio-environmental component of the region’s sustainable development. Economy of the region, 3, 142-151.

Bobylev, S. N. Solovyova, S. V. & Sitkina K. S. (2013). Indicators of sustainable development of the Ural region. Economy of the region, 2, 10–17.

Kiryushina, A. N. & Kurilova, A. A. (2017). Ecological and economic development of the Samara region. Azimuth of scientific research: economics and management, 6, 2(19), 118–121.

Porter, M. (2016). International Competition: Competitive Advantages of Countries. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 946.

Meller, K. & Rajal, A. (2008). Growth of strategic networks - new models of value creation. Russian Management Journal, 6, 4, 113–140.

Rubtsova, N. V. (2015). Socio-economic efficiency of tourist activities: theory, methodology, practice. Irkutsk: BSUEP publishing house, 212.

Tourism Satellite Account: Recommended Methodological Basis, 2008. (2010). UN, UNWTO, OECD, Eurostat. Luxembourg, Madrid, New York, Paris, 145.

Ismieva, R. T. (2011). Management of the Efficiency of the Activities of Tourism Business Organizations: author. diss. cand. econ sciences: 08.00.05. Makhachkala, 26.

Pyo, S. (2010). Measuring tourism chain. The Service Industries Journal, 30, 10 (August), 1669–1682.

Tikhonova, T. V. (2019). Ecosystem Services: Ways of Practical Use. Problems of Territory Development, 1(99), 25–39.

Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Komi. (2010): stat. Sat. / Comistat. Syktyvkar, 502.

Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Komi. (2017). Stat Comistat. Syktyvkar, 395.

Tikhonova, T. V. (2018). Modern methods for assessing ecosystem services and the potential for their practical application. Izvestia Komi Scientific Center, 4(36), 122–135.

Mirzekhanova, Z. G. & Koltsova, A. A. (2016). Can the protected areas of new development regions become centers of ecological tourism development? Service in Russia and abroad, 10, 8 (69), 58–67.

Prazdnikova, N. N. & Prudnikova, N. G. & Strizheva, O. S. (2017). Analysis of the development of tourism in the Altai Territory. Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University, 9 (155), 53-60.

Shkiperova, G. T. (2018). Evaluation of the ecological and economic effect of specially protected natural territories. Social Space, 3(15), 1-10.

Assessment of the impact of inbound tourism on the Russian economy: Report. Analytical Center under the Government of the Russian Federation. (2018), 25.

World Travel & Tourism Council: Travel & Tourism Benchmarking reports 2017. (2017). Retrevied from: http://www.wttc.org