TIME DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMIC REFORMS

Use of the system approach to management of social and economic processes is connected with existence of the immanent contradiction caused by a high level of abstraction of the definition "system" and a considerable level of concreteness of real economic tasks. The mentioned thesis needs formalization of descriptors of socio-economic systems and identification of basic management contours. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the necessity of using a systematic approach to the construction of the socio-economic system construct based on the identification of relevant descriptors and management contours. The methodological basis of the study was a combination of the Marxist school of political economy, the modern economic mainstream and unorthodox currents within the systemic paradigm. The main hypothesis of the study was the assumption regarding the possibility and feasibility of using descriptive methodology of systems identification to the needs of management of socio-economic systems. Statement of the basic material. On the basis of the analysis, a certain basis is provided for the formation of correlations of correspondence of the descriptors of the national socio-economic system to the corresponding axiomatic conditions and basic components. It is proved that the dualistic understanding of the individual as an economic and institutional basic element of the socio-economic system is fully appropriate to the understanding of the essence of the national economy. Institutions should be seen as a structure of connections that combine the elements into a unified integrity. It is proved that the state and its institutions play a dialectical role in ensuring the integral existence of the national socio-economic system of market type. Originality and practical significance of the research. The resulting theoretical and methodological concept has theoretical significance and can be transformed into relevant tools for the development of scientific and practical recommendations on the management of socio-economic systems. Conclusions and prospects for further research. The results of generalization of theoretical statements on the essence and content of the definitions of "socio-economic system" and "national economy" led to the conclusion about the impossibility of considering the economic subsystem (national economy) separately from other subsystems. The expediency and sufficiency of the use of the definition "national socio-economic system" as more acceptable for solving the dialectical unity of social and economic subsystems of society was proved. Further research will focus on the development of the methodical support for the identification of management contours on the basis of socio-economic descriptors

system, system descriptor, management outline, national socio-economic system, territorial locality

Burlutska, S. V. (2020) Systemic Approach to Project Management. Time description of Economic Reforms, 3 (39), 11–19.

Burlutska, S. V. (2016) Strategy for ensuring the resilience of sustainable development of the national economy: Theory and Practice: a monograph. Scientific editor N. Y. Rekova. Dnipro: Serednyak T. K, 320.

Karnai, J. (1990) Deficit. Moscow: Nauka, 607.

Semashko, L. M. (1992) Sphere Approach: Philosophy, Democracy, Market, Man. Moscow: Notabene, 368.

Bashnyanin, G. I. (2011) Commodity Economic Systems and the Formation of Market Structures. Economical Systems: Monograph. Т. 2. Edited by Prof. G. I. Bashnyanin. Lviv: LCA, 22-71.

Olsevich, Y. Я. (2007) Influence of Economic Reforms in Russia and China on the Economic Thought of the West. Moscow: Mysl. 372.

Aliev, A., Vesnin, V., Volovikov, S. (2013). Systemic nature of the national economy and the tasks of its state regulation. Business in the law,6, 230–234.

Ioda, Y. (2011) The influence of state economic interests on the process of self-assertion of the national economy. Socio-economic phenomena and processes, 10, 75–83.

Zaloznaya, G. M. (2004) The essence of national-state economic systems. Vestnik OGU, 8, 28–34.

Dementiev, V. (2002) The theory of national economy and mesoeconomic theory. Russian economic journal, 4, 71–78.

Bilotserkivets, V. V. (2009) National Economy: Tutorial for Students of Higher Education. Ed. by V. Tarasiewicz Kyiv: Center of academic literature, 280.

National Economy: Tutorial (2009). Еd. by V. P. Reshetilo. P. Reshetilo. Kharkiv: HNAMG, 386.

Polanyi, K. (1993). The self-regulating market and fictitious goods: labor, land and money. THESIS, 2(1), 10–17.

Avtonomov, V. (1998) The human model in economic science. Sanct-Peterburg: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 230.

Homo institutius - An Institutional Man (2005). a Monograph. Ed. by O. V. Inshakov. Volgograd: Volgograd State University Press, 854.