TIME DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMIC REFORMS

Unfortunately, the planned construction of an effective strategy for Ukraine's independence was not implemented. There were no constructive changes in the rules of economic life, the institutional structure of the state. Exit from crisis situations of various spheres of society, restoration of their vital activity were not provided with mechanisms of balance of economic efficiency and social justice. Thus, the problem of bringing the country out of the "trap of backwardness" has become extremely relevant. However, public authorities are left without a reliable program to address this problem. The backwardness is growing, so there is a need for a thorough review of the main ideas and technologies for diagnosing ways out of it. The purpose of the study is to determine the terminology and paradigm of theoretical and methodological support for bringing Ukraine out of the "trap of backwardness", to unite the efforts of all those interested in finding reserves to restore sustainable development of society. The methodological basis of the study were the methods of dialectics, methods and principles of interdisciplinary scientific knowledge of a complex subject, the rules of paradigm construction and its terminological support. The main idea of the study - theoretical and methodological justification for the withdrawal of Ukraine from the "trap of backwardness" must be built on the basis of an appropriate model of the paradigm and its terminology. Presenting main material. The main formulations of the research are formulated in the article, the stages of construction of the paradigm of bringing Ukraine out of the "trap of backwardness" are given, their content and rules of realization are determined. Particular attention is paid to the technology of reviewing the proposed options for defining terms in published works on the topic of the article. The originality and practical significance is confirmed by the proposed algorithm for building a paradigm model, terminological support for the study of a complex topic, which is at the phenomenological stage. Conclusions and prospects for further research. A constructive association of those wishing to determine the reserves for the restoration of sustainable development of society is possible provided that the model of the paradigm and its terminology is clarified. Further research on the topic should focus on clarifying the institutional basis that can really streamline the limitations of the system of traps in society.

Polterovich, V. M. (1999). Institutional traps and economic reforms. Economics and mathematical methods, 35, 2, 1–37.

Polterovich, V. M. (1998). Institutional dynamics and the theory of reforms. Evolutionary economics and the "main-stream": III International Symposium (Pushchino, May 30–31, 1998). Moscow.

Polterovich, V. M. (2007). Elements of the theory of reforms. Moscow: Publish-ing House "Economics", 447.

Bashnyanin, G. I., Shevchyk, B. M. (2015). The poverty trap and economic orientalism. Bulletin of the Lviv Com-mercial Academy. The series is econom-ical, 49, 185–193.

Berezhny, J. V. (2015). Institutional traps and the development of the institu-tional crisis in Ukraine. Economy and state, 9, 46–50.

Korablin, S. O. (2017). Macroeconomic dynamics of Ukraine: a trap of raw ma-terials markets: a monograph. Kyiv, 308.

Vasyltsiva, T. G., Lupaka, R. L. (2019). Mechanisms and functional-structural tools for ensuring the competitiveness of the national economy in terms of modern threats to economic security: a mono-graph. Lviv: NNVK "ATB", 552.

Onufrienko, G. S. (2009). Scientific style of the Ukrainian language: a textbook with algorithmic prescriptions. 2nd type. rework. and add. Kyiv: Center for Edu-cational Literature, 392.

Symonenko, L. (2003). Ukrainian termi-nological lexicography during the years of independence: achievements and mis-calculations. Ukrainian terminology and modernity, 5, 18–22.

Yelemesov, R. (2013). Theoretical level of economic judgments and the current state of economic science. Bulletin of Kaz-NU. Economic series, 4, 3–13.

Chizhevskaya, L. V. (2012). Features of the study of accounting terminology. Problems of theory and methodology of accounting, control and analysis, 2, 389–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2012-2(23)-389-400

Ginzburg, M., Kovalenko, S. (2014). On the harmonization of terminology asso-ciated with the formation, recording, storage and transmission of professional knowledge. Standardization. Certifica-tion. Quality, 5, 3–10.

Serbinovskaya, N. V. (2019). The prob-lem of correct development of scientific terminology in the acceleration of scien-tific and technological progress. Bulletin of Science and Education of the North-West of Russia, 5, 2.

Dictionary of the Ukrainian language: in 11 volumes (1971). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 2, 259.

Modern economic vocabulary (2007). 5th ed., Rev. and add. Moscow: INFRA-M, 495.

Kochan, I. (2009). Ukrainian terms in the paradigm of modern scientific scholars. Ukrainian terminology and modernity, VIII, 30–34.

Kyzym, M. O., Doronina, M. S. (2019). Economic Science in Ukraine: Challeng-es, Problems and Ways of their Solving. Problems of the economy, 3, 156–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2019-3-156-163

Kyzym, M. O., Doronina, M. S. (2019). Worldview, Social Consolidation, Sci-ence: Dialectic Relationship. Problems of the economy, 4, 156–162.

Doronina, M. S. (2013). Ontognosiolog-ical backgrounds for studying enterprise socio – economic potential. The Ad-vanced Science Journal, 12, 26–31.

Doroshenko, S. M. (2013). Ukrainian terminology of oil and gas industry: formation and development: a mono-graph. Poltava: PoltNTU Publishing House, 137.

Serbinovskaya, N. V., Bakmatova, Yu. A. (2019). Research and modeling of professional speech communication of a sales assistant of a furniture salon. Scien-tific Spring - 2019: Economic Sciences: Sat. scientific. tr. Shakhty, 206–219.

Doronina, M. S. (2012). Terminological support for the study of educational pro-cesses of the production organization. Bulletin of the East Ukrainian National University. V. Dahl, 16, 2, 235–241.

Doronina, M. S., Bilokonenko, G.V. and Serikov, D. O. (2017). Terminological system of research of development of managerial competence of the head in the conditions of professionalization of management. Efficient economy, 2. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/op=1&z=5424

Doronina, M. S., Lugova, V. M., Serikov, D. O. and Doronin, S. A. (2019). Devel-opment of management competence of business leaders: a monograph. Kharkiv: FOP Liburkina LM, 182.

Sokolov, A. V. Forsythe: a look into the future. Foresight. 2007. T. 1. № 1. S. 8–15.

Doronina, M. S., Mikhailenko, D. G. and Polubedova, A. A. (2013). Technology of socio-economic research (schemes and examples) / under common. ed. MS Do-ronina: textbook. 4th ed., Ext. Kharkiv: INZHEK Publishing House, 170.

Dubaseniuk, O. A., Samoilenko, O. A. (2020). Fundamentals of andragogy (for specialists in the field of adult education): teaching method. way. Zhytomyr: ZhSU Publishing House. I. Franko, 175.

Marchuk, A. V. (2020). Andragogy: textbook. way. Lviv: Lviv Department of Internal Affairs, 300.

Shchudlo, S. A. (2012). Higher educa-tion in search of quality: a monograph. Kharkiv; Drogobich: Kolo, 340.

Vasina, A. Yu. (2017). Structural reform of the national economy: methodological and institutional aspects: monograph. Ternopil: Economic Thought of TNEU, 2017. 392 p.

Grazhevskaya, N. I., Zavazhenko, A. A. (2019). Institutional traps of market re-form of the economy of Ukraine. Scien-tific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University, 820, 3–10.