COMPETENCE MANAGEMENT CENTER: RESOLUTION OF CONTRACTS OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE THANKS TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

Андрій Олегович Дєгтяр, Вероніка Геннадіївна Ковальчук, Максим Петрович Бублій

Abstract


Problem statement. The article examines the competence management center as a means of resolving contradictions in public administration. It is determined that the essence of the problem lies in the fact that the introduction of information and communication technologies contributes to the development of a higher level of human thinking and motivation for its actions, and accordingly there are new requirements for the quality standards of public administration, which leads to an aggravation of the contradictions of public administration. The purpose of the study is formation of conceptual bases of creation and functional realization of the center of management of competences for the decision of contradictions of public management which have arisen owing to use of modern information technologies. The object of this research is the contradictions of public administration caused by the use of information technologies and tools and means of their solution. The research uses general scientific and special methods: analysis and synthesis, logical, dialectical, generalization method, complex and systematic approaches. Research methods: in the process of scientific work were used general and special methods of scientific abstraction, induction and deduction, statistical analysis, analogy and quantitative and qualitative comparison. The research hypothesis is the assumption that the contradictions of public administration that are caused by the use of information technologies can be resolved by applying the competence management center. Presentation of the main material. It is found out that the main contradiction of the functioning of the management system is that if there is a significant need to update the public nature of management, the lack of proper mechanisms for attracting the object of management represented by the population of a particular territory to participate in the process of forming alternatives, evaluation criteria, analysis, selection and implementation of management decisions requires a solution. Originality and practical significance of the research. It is proved that the use of modern public management tools (development of e-government technologies; the development of innovative information and communication infrastructure using public-private partnership opportunities; the use of a political marketing tool; the introduction of foresight, crowdsourcing and public audit technologies) does not contribute effectively enough to resolving the above contradictions. Conclusions and prospects for further research. As a promising tool, a competence management center is proposed, which helps to resolve contradictions that are becoming more acute in the context of the introduction of information and communication technologies.


Keywords


competence management center, public administration, contradictions of public administration, information and communication technologies, e-government, public-private partnership

References


Gaponenko, N. V. (2012). Fore-sight. Theory. Methodology. Ex-perience. Moscow: Unity-Dana, 239.

Kovbasiuk, Yu. V. (2016). Crowdsourcing as an instrument of public authority. Actual prob-lems of economy, 4, 349-357.

Kruhlov, V. V. (2019). Devel-opment of state-private partner-ship in Ukraine: mechanisms of state regulation. Kharkiv: Mag-istr, 252.

Marchenko, V. V. (2016). Elec-tronic regulation in the organs of the viconavcha power: administrative-legal ambush. Kharkiv: Panov, 444.

Minenko, M. A. (2014). Public administration: theory and methodology. Kyiv: Kyiv. nats. torh.-ekon. un-t, 404.

Pasternak, O. I. (2009). Econom-ic development of the region: marketing protection. Lviv: NAS of Ukraine. Institute of Regional Studies, 200.

Vasylevskа, T. E. (Ed.). (2018). Problems of reforming the state service and service in the bodies of the local self-assembly in Ukraine. Kyiv: NADU, 256.

Chernov, S., Voronkovа, V., Banakh, V., Sosnin, O., Zhukauskas, P., Vvainkhardt, Y., Andriukaitene, R. (Eds.). (2016). Public administration and ad-ministration in the minds of in-formation support: revision and foreign information. Za-porizhzhia: ZDIA, 606.

Khadzhyradieva, S. K., Vorono-va, S. V., Kravtsova, N. I. (2017). Professionalism in the sphere of public administration: camp, problems, perspectives of publication. Mykolaiv: Yemelianova T. V., 165.

Tsvietkov, V. V., Horbatenko, V. P. (2001). Democracy - Man-agement - Bureaucracy: in the context of modernization of the Ukrainian government: mono-graph. Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V.M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, 248.

Chaplai I. V., Romanenko Ye. O. (2016). Marketing at the mecha-nisms of state management: monograph. Kyiv: DP «Vyd. dim «Personal», 208.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/cher.2021.1.14

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.