Numerical study of the influence of quadrotor blade parameters on aerodynamic noise generation

Petro Lukianov, Oleg Dusheba

Abstract


The aim of this paper is to study the effect of variation of the parameters of a small-sized quadrotor blade on the level of aerodynamic noise and its frequency spectrum. There is a certain discrepancy between the calculated and experimental data available today. The reason for this is that the study of quadrotor rotor noise is carried out using various theoretical models that do not consider certain factors of sound generation or additional artificial sound sources, which result in an overestimated noise level. Therefore, there is a need for an accurate model, the calculation of which more closely matches the experimental data. In the paper below, an aerodynamic noise model is proposed to study the noise of a quadrocopter blade, which considers the non-stationarity and three-dimensionality of the sound generation and propagation process. The research methods are based on the numerical calculation of the characteristics of the near and far sound fields in the potential approximation: pressure coefficient, sound pressure level, and spectrum of the generated sound. The main parameters that were varied during numerical calculations were the rotor speed of the quadrotor, angle of attack, torsion angle, and blade position in the plane of rotation. The NASA parabolic profile was used as the test profile. Results and conclusions. The results of numerical calculations in the near field revealed three areas of sound generation above the blade surface. The first region, which is more unstable, is caused by blade torsion. The other two sound generation areas are smoothly distributed along the blade’s swing, and the pressure change level in each of them doubles. The level of generated aerodynamic noise is largely dependent on the blade speed and the distance from the blade at which the noise is calculated. The angle of attack and blade pitch have a smaller effect on the generated noise level, and in the far field, they have almost no effect on the maximum noise level. The dependence of noise on the distance to the blade, as well as the blade parameters, which were chosen similar to those studied by other authors, showed a fairly good agreement with the calculations of these authors and with experimental studies. Because of aerodynamic calculations and noise generation around the quadrotor blade using ANSYS software, it was found that sound vibrations occur during the flow around the blade tip, with a level of 120 dB in the immediate vicinity of the blade surface. Calculations using a 3D model of the propeller confirmed that the volume reached 80 dB at the nearest reference point, which closely matches the data from the calculation based on the potential model and the experimental data.

Keywords


aerodynamic noise; numerical methods; quadrocopter

Full Text:

PDF

References


Environmental Protection Technical Specifications applicable to VTOL-capable aircraft powered by non-tilting rotors. EASA, 2023, iss. 1. 71 p. Available at: https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/139022/en. (accessed 12.01.2024).

Kevin Li, S. An Analytic Method to Predict Rotor Blade Wake Interaction. VFS' 79th Annual Forum & Technology Display, May 16-18, 2023 Palm Beach County Convention Center, West Palm Beach, Florida, pp. 1-12. DOI: 10.4050/F-0079-2023-17953.

Kevin Li, S., & Lee, S. Acoustic Analysis and Sound Quality Assessment of a Quiet Helicopter for Air Taxi Operations. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2022, vol. 67, iss. 3, pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.4050/JAHS.67.032001.

Froude, W. On the Elementary Relation between Pitch, Slip and Propulsive Efficiency. Transaction of the Institute of Naval Architects, 1878, vol. 19, pp. 22-33.

Farassat, F., & Myers, M. K. Extension of Kirchhoff’s Formula to Radiation from Moving Surfaces. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1988, vol. 123, iss. 3, p. 451-461. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-460X(88)80162-7.

Romani, G., Grande, E., Avallone, F., Ragni, D., & Casalino, D. Perforence and noise prediction of low-Reynolds number propellers using the Lattice-Boltzmann method. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, vol. 125, article no. 107086. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107086.

Jonson, W., & Silva, C. NASA concept vehicles and the advanced air mobility aircraft. The Aeronautical Journal, 2022, vol. 126, special iss. 1295, pp. 59-91. DOI: 10.1017/aer.2021.92.

Kostek, A. A., Lößle, F., Wickershein, R., Keßler, M., Boisaerd, R., Reboul, G., Visingardi, A., Bartarino, M., & Gardner, A. D. Experimental investigation of UAV rotor aeroacoustics and aerodynamics with computational cross-validation. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, September 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s13272-023-00680-z.

Yin, J., Rossignol, K.-S., Rottmann, L., & Schwarz, T. Numerical studies on small rotor confgurations with validation using acoustic wind tunnel data. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, June 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s13272-023-00671-0.

Lukianov, P. V. Nestatsionarnoye rasprostraneniye malykh vozmushcheniy ot tonkogo kryla: blizhneye i dal'neye pole [Nonstationary propagation of small disturbances from a thin wing: near and far field]. Akustychnyi visnyk – Acoustic Herald, 2009, vol.12, iss. 3, pp. 41-55. Available at: https://hydromech.org.ua/content/uk/av/av-12-3.html. (accessed 11.02.2024).

Škultéty, F., Bujna, E., Janovec, M., & Kandera, B. Noise Impact Assessment of UAS Operation in Urbanised Areas: Field Measurements and a Simulation. Drones, 2023, vol. 7, iss. 5, article no. 314. DOI: 10.3390/drones7050314.

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Consolidated version of Regulation (EU) 2019/947 as retained (and amended in UK domestic law) under the European Union (Withdrawal), Act 2018 CAP1789A. Available at: https://www.caa.co.uk/publication/download/17981 (accessed 12.11.2023).

Thurman, C. S., & Baeder, J. D. Blade-Wake Interaction Noise for Hovering sUAS Rotors, Part I: Characterization Study. AIAA Journal, 2023, vol. 61, no. 6. DOI: 10.2514/1.J062565.

Sinibaldi, G., & Marino, L. Experimental analysis on the noise of propellers for small UAV. Applied Acoustics. 2013, vol. 74, iss. 1, pp. 79-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.06.011.

Gur, O., & Rosen, A. Design of a Quiet Propeller for an Electric Mini Unmanned Air Vehicle. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2009, vol. 25, iss. 3, pp.717-728. DOI: 10.2514/1.38814.

Cussen, K., Garruccio, S., & Kennedy, J. UAV Noise Emission—A Combined Experimental and Numerical Assessment. Acoustics, 2022, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 297-312. DOI: 10.3390/acoustics4020018.

Roger, M., & Moreau, S. Tonal-noise assessment of quadrotor-type UAV using source-mode expansions. Acoustics, 2020, vol. 2, iss. 3, pp. 674-690. DOI: 10.3390/acoustics2030036.

Gutin, L. On the Sound Field of a Rotating Propeller. NACA Technical Memorandum No. 1195, Washigton, 1948. 22 p. Available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20030068996/downloads/20030068996.pdf (accessed 12.1.2024).

Kim, D. H., Park, C. H., & Moon, Y. J. Aerodynamic analyses on the steady and unsteady loading-noise sources of drone propellers. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci., 2019, vol. 20, pp. 611-619. DOI: 10.1007/s42405-019-00176-3.

Han, D., Gwak, D. Y., & Lee, S. Noise prediction of multi-rotor UAV by RPM fluctuation correction method. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2020, vol. 34, iss. 4, pp. 1429-1443. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-020-0305-2.

Noda, R., Ikeda, T., Nakata, T., & Liu, H. Characterization of the low-noise drone propeller with serrated Gurney flap. Frontiers in Aerospace Engineering, 2022, vol. 1, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.3389/fpace.2022.1004828.

Intaratep, N., Alexander, W. N., Devenport, W. J., Grace, S., & Dropkin, M. A. Experimental Study of Quadcopter Acoustics and Performance at Static Thrust Conditions. 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2016, 30 May - 1 June, Lyon, France. Available at: https://www.bu.edu/ufmal/files/2016/07/aiaa-2016-2873.pdf. (accessed 12.01.2024).

Kelecy, Fr. J. An Examination of Quadcopter Drone Noise Using Computational Aeroacoustics. ANSYS Inc. Advanced Modeling & Simulation (AMS) Seminar Series NASA Ames Research Center, October 14, 2021. 47 p. Available at: https://www.nas.nasa.gov/assets/nas/pdf/ams/2021/AMS_20211014_Kelecy.pdf. (accessed 12.11.2023).

Massey, K., & Gaeta, R. Noise Measurements of Tactical UAVs. 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-3911.

Kloet, N., Watkins, S., & Clothier, R. Acoustic signature measurement of small multi-rotor unmanned aircraft systems. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 2017, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.1177/1756829316681868.

Heydari, M., Sadat, H., & Singh, R. A Computational Study on the Aeroacoustics of a Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial System. Appl. Sci., 2021, vol. 11, iss.20, article no. 9732. DOI: 10.3390/app11209732.

Lukianov, P. V. Vplyv formy, kryvyzny poperechnoho pererizu lopati rotora na parametry shumu obertannya [The influence of the shape and curvature of the cross section of the rotor blade on the parameters of rotation noise]. Naukovi visti NTUU «KPI» : mizhnarodnyy naukovo-tekhnichnyy zhurnal – Scientific news of NTUU "KPI": international scientific and technical journal, 2012, vol. 4(84), pp. 149-153. Available at: https://ela.kpi.ua/items/27584f07-8247-41ad-bbe0-d3300128ee95. (accessed 2.02.2024).

Lukianov, P., & Dusheba, O. Modeling of Aerodynamic Noise of Quadrotor Type Aerotaxis. Aviacijno-kosmicna tehnika i tehnologia – Aerospace technic and technology, 2023, vol. 4, pp. 38-49. DOI: 10.32620/aktt.2023.4.05.

Caradonna, F. X., & Isom, M. P. Subsonic and Transonic Potential Flow over Helicopter Rotor Blades. AIAA Journal, 1972, vol. 10, iss.12, pp. 1606-1612. DOI: 10.2514/3.50404.

Caradonna, F., X., & Isom, M., P. Numerical Calculation of Unsteady Transonic Potential Flow over Helicopter Rotor Blades. AIAA Journal, 1976, vol. 14, iss.4, pp. 482-488. DOI: 10.2514/3.61387.

Ballhaus, W. R., & Goorjian, P. M. Implicit finite-Difference Computations of Unsteady Transonic Flows about Airfoils. AIAA Journal, 1977, vol. 15, iss. 12, pp. 1728-1735. DOI: 10.2514/3.60838.

Lukianov, P. V. Ob odnom chislenno-analiticheskom podkhode k resheniyu zadachi generatsii zvuka tonkim krylom. Chast' I. Obshchaya skhema primeneniya dlya ploskoy statsionarnoy zadachi [About one numerical-analytical approach to solving the problem of sound generation by a thin wing. Part I. General scheme of application for a plane stationary problem]. Akustychnyi visnyk – Acoustic Herald, 2011, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 46-52. Available at: http://hydromech.org.ua/content/uk/av/av-14-3.html. (accessed 11.02.2024).

Lukianov, P. V. Ob odnom chislenno-analiticheskom podkhode k resheniyu zadachi generatsii zvuka tonkim krylom. Chast' II. Skhema primeneniya dlya nestatsionarnykh zadach [About one numerical-analytical approach to solving the problem of sound generation by a thin wing. Part II. Application diagram for non-stationary tasks]. Akustychnyi visnyk – Acoustic Herald, 2012, vol.15, iss. 3, pp. 45-52. Available at: http://hydromech.org.ua/content/ru/av/15-3_45-52.html. (accessed 11.02.2024).

Von Karman, T. The similarity low of transonic flow. Journal of Math. and Phisics, 1947, vol. 26, iss. 1-4, pp. 182-190. DOI: 10.1002/SAPM1947261182.

Courant, R., & Friedrichts, K. O. Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves, Interscience Publishers, 1948. 440 p. Available at: https://books.google.mw/books?id=Qsxec0QfYw8C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_vpt_read#v=onepage&q&f=false. (accessed 11.02.2024).

Lukianov, P. V. Vplyv formy, kryvyzny poperechnoho pererizu lopati rotora helikoptera na parametry shumu obertannya [The influence of the shape and curvature of the cross-section of the helicopter rotor blade on the parameters of rotation noise]. Naukovi visti NTUU «KPI» : mizhnarodnyy naukovo-tekhnichnyy zhurnal – Scientific news of NTUU "KPI": international scientific and technical journal, 2012, no. 4, pp. 149-153. Available at: https://ela.kpi.ua/bitstream/123456789/36878/1/2012-4-25.pdf. (accessed 11.02.2024).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2024.2.02