NONLINEAR QUADROTOR MODELING: FROM ANALYTICAL DERIVATION TO PHYSICAL SIMULATION

Vitalii Dzhulgakov, Dmytro Sokol

Abstract


The subject matter of this study is the expansion of an H-frame quadrotor mathematical model to include nonlinearities and the implementation of its dynamics within the Simscape Multibody simulation environment. The goal is to develop a comprehensive nonlinear motion model and verify its accuracy by comparing analytical descriptions with physics-based component modeling. The tasks to be solved are: to analyze the challenges of describing and implementing nonlinear quadrotor models; to formulate a system of nonlinear differential equations using the Euler–Lagrange formalism; to conduct simulation experiments on the initial mathematical model; to develop and integrate a physical rigid-body model into the automatic control system; to perform a comparative analysis of the results. Methods are used: the Euler–Lagrange formalism, numerical methods, and comparative statistical analysis. The following results were obtained: a refined nonlinear mathematical model of an H-frame quadrotor was developed, accounting for cross-coupled gyroscopic effects and electromechanical actuator dynamics. A dynamic model based on physical constraints and inertia tensors was implemented in Simscape Multibody. Maneuvering scenarios for both the mathematical and multi-domain models indicate characteristic transients for orientation angles within the [11, 15] s interval. It was determined that the steady-state deviation for the mathematical model is 0.1° for yaw and roll and 0.12° for pitch, while the maximum error over the simulation interval reached 2.4° for yaw, 0.1° for roll, and 0.15° for pitch. Corresponding indicators for the multi-domain model were: a steady-state deviation of 1° for yaw, 0.9° for roll, and 1.3° for pitch, with maximum errors of 3°, 0.9°, and 1.3°, respectively. These values result from natural error accumulation due to different kinematic parameterization methods, gyroscopic moments, and electromechanical dynamics. Conclusions. The scientific novelty of the results obtained is as follows: the scientific and methodological approach to assessing the fidelity of complex dynamic systems was further developed, which, unlike existing ones, is based on the cross-platform verification of the analytical Euler–Lagrange formalism and multi-domain simulation; this allowed for the first time to establish the applicability limits of nonlinear models and to quantitatively determine the error in reproducing flight scenario caused by specific kinematic parameterization and cross-coupling dynamics. Quantitative evaluation confirmed the fidelity of both models. The steady-state deviations between the two models are 0.9° (yaw), 0.8° (roll), and 1.2° (pitch); at maximum error, they are 4.2° (yaw), 0.8° (roll), and 1.23° (pitch). Utilizing Simscape physical components significantly simplifies frame parameter modification, process visualization, and the formulation of coupling equations, as the tool handles part of the model implementation. The proposed approach provides a high-fidelity virtual prototype for testing robust control algorithms under conditions close to real-world operation

Keywords


quadrotor; control system; nonlinear dynamics; Euler–Lagrange formalism; multi-domain simulation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Fedorovich, O., Popov, A., Pisklova, T., Malieiev, L., Rybka, A., Fedorovich, V. Modeling the life cycle reduction for the rapid development of UAVs for use in military missions. Aerospace Technic and Technology, 2026, no. 1 (209), pp. 95-107.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2026.1.09 .

Damanik, I., Dermawan, J. A., Sitanggang, I. M., Hutabarat, F. S., Boy Knight, G. P., Sagala, A. Quadcopter Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Design for Search and Rescue (SAR). International Conference of Computer Science and Information Technology (ICOSNIKOM), Laguboti, North Sumatra, Indonesia, IEEE, 2022, pp. 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSNIKOM56551.2022.10034866

Sun, J., Yuan, G., Song, L., Zhang, H.Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in landslide investigation and monitoring: A review. Drones, 2024, vol. 8, no. 1(30). 27 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8010030

Zhang, H., Zou, L., Yang, Y., Ma, J., Xiao, J., Lin, P. Urban Medical Emergency Logistics Drone Base Station Location Selection. Drones, 2026, vol. 10,

no. 1 (17), 36 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/

drones10010017 .

Tsekhmystro, R., Rubel, O., Lukin, V. Study of the dependence of accuracy in vehicles search on the size of the object using UAV images. Aerospace Technic and Technology, 2024, no. 3 (195), pp. 89-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2024.3.08 .

Tanaka, S., Asignacion, A., Nakata, T.,Suzuki, S., Liu, H. Review of biomimetic approaches for drones. Drones, 2022, vol. 6, no. 11 (320), 15 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6110320 .

Liu, T., Wang, S., Liu, H., He, G. Engineering perspective on bird flight: Scaling, geometry, kinematics and aerodynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2023, vol. 142. 47 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100933 .

Vourtsis, C., Rochel, V. C., Müller, N. S., Stewart, W., Floreano, D. Wind defiant morphing drones. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2023, vol. 5, iss. 3. 8 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202200297 .

Lou, H., Wu, Q., Wang, H., Li, M., Liu, H., Sun, N. Structure, Modeling, and Control of Morphing Quadrotors: A Review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2026, vol. 27,pp. 825-842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-025-01405-4 .

Liu, W., Ren, Y., Guo, R., Kong, V. W. W., Hung, A. S. P., Zhu, F., Cai, Y. Slope inspection under dense vegetation using LiDAR-based quadrotors. Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16. 14 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62801-y .

Gomathi, P., Deena Rose, D., Sampath Kumar, R., Sathya Priya, M., Dinesh, S., Ramarao, M. Computer Vision for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Agriculture: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities. The Scientific Temper, 2023, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 957-962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58414/SCIENTIFICTEMPER.2023.14.3.61 .

Derrouaoui, S. H., Bouzid, Y., Guiatni, M. Nonlinear Robust Control of a New Reconfigurable Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Robotics, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 2. 13 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10020076 .

Nguyen, N. P., Mung, N. X., Thanh, H. L. N. N., Huynh, T. T., Lam, N. T., Hong, S. K. Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Attitude and Altitude System of a Quadcopter UAV via Neural Network. Access IEEE, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 40076-40085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064883 .

Dong, F., Yuan, B., Zhao, X., Ding, Z., Chen, S. Adaptive robust constraint-following control for morphing quadrotor UAV with uncertainty: a segmented modeling approach. Journal of the Frank-lin Institute, 2024, vol. 361, iss. 5. 15 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2024.106678 .

Moustafa, E. N., Kamezaki, M., Miyake, S., Sugano, S. A Quadrotor With a New 3-DOF Hybrid Manipulator for Pipeline Maintenance: Design, Modeling, and Task-Space Control. Access IEEE, 2025, vol. 13, pp. 198102-198124, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3633759 .

Djizi, H., Zahzouh, Z., Bouzaouit, A. Quadcopter Prototype Stability Assessment With Pid Controller And Euler-Lagrange Approach. The Scientific Bulletin of Electrical Engineering Faculty, Valahia University of Targoviste, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 15-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sbeef-2023-0003 .




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2026.3.09