Олександр Сергійович Мартиненко, Юлія Юріївна Гусєва, Ігор Володимирович Чумаченко


The need to make grounded decisions while monitoring and managing the requirements of stakeholders is an integral part of the project management as a whole, which, in particular, determines the quality and success of the project.  Known models and methods of project monitoring and control do not have a separate tool for monitoring the fulfillment of the requirements of stakeholders in projects and programs. Earlier authors suggested a model of juxtaposition of the hierarchical structure of the project with the hierarchical structure of the project requirements, the hierarchical structure of the project risks, the hierarchical structure of the project resources, and the organizational structure of the project. Thus, the "work-requirement”, "work-resource", "work-responsible", "work-risk" model (4R & WS) was established. The proposed method allows tracking the dynamics of project implementation by factors of the model (risks, requirements, resources, stakeholders, executors). The practical use of the method requires the formalization of the above relationships. If the relationship between "work-responsible" and "work-resource" can be specified explicitly, the links between "work-and-risk" and "work-requirement" should be given in the fuzzy form.The purpose of this article is to provide informational support for the 4R & WS method by constructing a process for formalizing fuzzy connections of the corresponding model.The process of formalization of fuzzy relationships was carried out to provide information support for the project monitoring and control method based on the comparison of the hierarchical structure of project activities with the hierarchical structure of project requirements, the hierarchical structure of project risks, the hierarchical structure of project resources, and the organizational structure of the project. A functional model of the process is constructed. The use of the results of expert evaluation for the construction of membership functions is suggested. The methods of constructing membership functions are analyzed; the use of the method of statistical processing of expert information is justified.


expert evaluation; project; membership function; requirements; stakeholders; monitoring


Siju, H. L. Patel, P. Survey of Models and Tools for Project Monitoring and Control. International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, 2017, no. 3(10), pp. 19-24.

Lee, C. S., Wang, M. H., Chen, J. J., Hsu C. Y. Ontology-based intelligent decision support agent for CMMI project monitoring and control. Annu. Conf. North Am. Fuzzy Inf. Process. Soc.-NAFIPS, 2006, no. 48, pp. 627 – 631.

Morales-Trujillo, M. E., Oktaba, H., Orozco, M. J. Using ESSENCE ALPHAs in a CMMI level 5 software development organization. Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, 2016, vol. 8, pp. 1531–1538.

Barreto, A. O. S., Rocha, A. R. Analyzing the similarity among software projects to improve software project monitoring processes. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Qual. Inf. Commun. Technol. QUATIC, 2010, pp. 441–446.

de Souza, V. F., L’Erario, A., Fabri, J. A. Model for monitoring and control of software production in distributed projects. 10th Iber. Conf. Inf. Syst. Technol., 2015, pp. 1–6.

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Fifth Edition. Newtown Square, Pa., Project Management Insti-tute, Inc., 2013. 614 p.

Practice Standard for Earned Value Management. Newtown Square, Pa., Project Management Institute, Inc., 2005. 56 p.

Hazir, O. A review of analytical models, approach-es and decision support tools in project monitoring and control. International Journal of Project Man-agement, 2014, no. 33(4), pp. 808-815.

Husyeva, Yu. Yu., Martynenko, O. S., Chumachenko, I. V. Matrychna model' 4R & WS dlya klasyfikatsiyi steykkholderiv proektu [Matrix Model 4R & WS for the classification of the project stakeholders]. Visnyk Nats. tekhn. un-tu "KhPI": zb. nauk. pr. Ser.: Stratehichne upravlinnya, up-ravlinnya portfelyamy, prohramamy ta proektamy, 2017, no. 2 (1224), pp. 18-22. (In Ukrainian).

Husyeva, Yu. Yu., Martynenko, O. S., Chumachenko, I. V. Protsesnyy pidkhid do modelyuvannya i monitorynhu vymoh zatsikavlenykh storin [Process approach to modeling and monitoring of stakeholder requirements]. Informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi ta innovatsiyi v ekonomitsi, upravlinni proektamy i prohramamy, 2016, pp. 289-296. (In Ukrainian).

Kaid, V. A. A. Metody postroeniya funktsii prinadlezhnosti nechetkikh mnozhestv [Methods construction membership function of fuzzy sets]. Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 2013, no. 2 (139), pp. 144-153. (In Russian).

Shtovba, S. D. Pobudova funktsiy nalezhnosti nechitkykh mnozhyn za klasteryzatsiyeyu eksperymental'nykh danykh [Construction of fuzzy set membership functions by clustering experimental data]. Informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi ta komp’yuterna inzheneriya, 2006, no. 2, pp. 92–95. (In Russian).

Shtovba, S. D. Vvedenie v teoriyu nechetkikh mnozhestv i nechetkuyu logiku [Introduction to the theory of fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic]. Available at: (аccessed 08.08.2017). (In Russian).

Myronchuk, Yu. V. Kuprinenko, O. M. Pobudova funktsiy nalezhnosti nechitkykh mnozhyn, yaki vidpovidayut' kil'kisnym ekspertnym otsinkam fizychnykh velychyn [Construction of membership functions of fuzzy sets that correspond to quantitative expert estimates of physical quantities]. Systemy obrobky informatsiy, 2017, no. 1, pp. 93-97. (In Russian).

Irzaev, G. Kh. Ekspertnye metody upravleniya tekhnologichnost'yu promyshlennykh izdelii [Expert methods of control of manufacturability of industrial products], Moscow, Infra-Inzheneriya Publ., 2010. 192 p. (In Russian).

Kartashov, M. V. Imovirnist', protsesy, statystyka [Implicitness, processes, statistics], Kiev, Vydavnycho-polihrafichnyy tsentr «Kyyivs'kyy universytet» Publ., 2008. 494 p. (In Russian).


  • There are currently no refbacks.