Formation of a heterogeneous group of UAVS with a reasonable number of false and real drones

Volodymyr Prymirenko, Andrii Demianiuk, Roman Shevtsov, Serhii Bazilo, Andrey Pilipenko, Mykola Vovchanskyi

Abstract


The subject of scientific research is the joint use of false and real unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as part of a heterogeneous group of UAVs to perform military tasks. This article aimsto determine the appropriate number of false and real drones (UAVs) as part of a heterogeneous group of UAVs to ensure that a certain number of real UAVs can fly to targets with the aim of further reliable target destruction. The scientific task is to develop a methodology for determining the appropriate number of false drones in a heterogeneous group of UAVs, considering the diversity of UAVs included in the UAV group. To achieve the goals of scientificresearch, partial scientific tasks were solved. The joint use of false drones as part of a UAV group to defeat targets with a given degree of damage was formalized. The formalization was carried out taking into account two possible cases of use: a) when the enemy has a sufficient number of means to destroy the entire group of UAVs; b) when the enemy has an insufficient number of means to destroy the entire UAV group. A mathematical model for determining the optimal composition of false and real drones (UAVs) as parts of a heterogeneous group of UAVs has been developed, which will allow to fulfill the task of defeating enemy targets with the desired degree of reliability. A program code has been developed that simplifies the mathematical calculations in the presented mathematical model and allows it to be used in the process of making an appropriate military decision. An algorithm to find the numbers of real and false UAVs in a heterogeneous group of UAVs is proposed. The obtained formulas and algorithms were verified by computer simulation using the Monte Carlo method. Methods. The mathematical model is based on combinatorial methods of probability theory. Programming for calculating analytical formulas and computer modeling of the Monte Carlo method was carried out based on the R computer language. The following results were obtained. A multifunctional algorithm is presented: on one hand, its application makes it possible to determine the optimal number of false UAVs in a heterogeneous group of UAVs to ensure that the required number of real UAVs reach the target, and on the other hand, to determine the predicted loss level of real UAVs in a heterogeneous group of UAVs when using a certain number of false drones.Conclusions. The availability of the developed mathematical model, algorithm, and program code makes it possible to predict the possible results of the combat use of heterogeneous groups of UAVs based on the initial parameters and to substantiate recommendations for a possible composition of such groups.

Keywords


unmanned aerial vehicle; drone; decoy; heterogeneous group

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sun, J., Yuan, G., Song, L., & Zhang, H. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Landslide Investigation and Monitoring: A Review. Drones, 2024, vol. 8, iss. 1, article no. 30. DOI: 10.3390/drones8010030.

Rudys, S., Laučys, A., Ragulis, P., Aleksiejūnas, R., Stankevičius, K., Kinka, M., Razgūnas, M., Bručas, D., Udris, D., & Pomarnacki, R. Hostile UAV Detection and Neutralization Using a UAV System. Drones, 2022, vol. 6, iss. 9, article no. 250. DOI: 10.3390/drones6090250.

Xia, Y., Batta, R., & Nagi, R. Controlling a Fleet of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Collect Uncertain Information in a Threat Environment. Operations Research, 2017, vol. 65, iss. 3, pp. ii-iv, 557-836. DOI: 10.1287/opre.2017.1590.

Al Younes, Y., & Barczyk, M. Adaptive Nonlinear Model Predictive Horizon Using Deep Reinforcement Learning for Optimal Trajectory Planning. Drones, 2022, vol. 6, iss. 11, article no. 323. DOI: 10.3390/drones6110323.

Phadke, A., & Medrano, F. A. Towards Resilient UAV Swarms – A Breakdown of Resiliency Requirements in UAV Swarms. Drones, 2022, vol. 6, iss. 11, article no. 340. DOI: 10.3390/drones6110340.

Li, J., & Chen, R. A Distributed Task Scheduling Method Based on Conflict Prediction for Ad Hoc UAV Swarms. Drones, 2022, vol. 6, iss. 11, article no. 356. DOI: 10.3390/drones6110356.

Liu, B., Wang, S., Li, Q., Zhao, X., Pan, Y., & Wang, C. Task Assignment of UAV Swarms Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. Drones, 2023, vol. 7, iss. 5, article no. 297. DOI: 10.3390/drones7050297.

Su, Z.-L., Jiang, X.-L., Li, N., Ling, H.-F., & Zheng, Y.-J. Optimization of False Target Jamming against UAV Detection. Drones, 2022, vol. 6, iss. 5, article no. 114. DOI: 10.3390/drones6050114.

Khawaja, W., Yaqoob, Q., & Guvenc, I. RL-Based Detection, Tracking, and Classification of Malicious UAV Swarms through Airborne Cognitive Multibeam Multifunction Phased Array Radar. Drones, 2023, vol. 7, iss. 7, article no. 470. DOI: 10.3390/drones7070470.

Grosfils, P. Information Transmission in a Drone Swarm: A Temporal Network Analysis. Drones, 2024, vol. 8, iss. 1, article no. 28, DOI: 10.3390/drones8010028.

Prymirenko, V, Demianiuk, A., Shevtsov, R., Bazilo, S., & Steshenko, P. The impact of the joint use of false aircraft targets in a group of combat unmanned aerial vehicles on the results of destruction. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, 2022, no. 3(103), pp. 132-140. DOI: 10.32620/reks.2022.3.10.

Li, B., Zhang, H., He, P., Wang, G., Yue, K., & Neretin, E. Hierarchical Maneuver Decision Method Based on PG-Option for UAV Pursuit-Evasion Game. Drones, 2023, vol. 7, iss. 7, article no. 449. DOI: 10.3390/drones7070449.

Shahid, S., Zhen, Z., Javaid, U., & Wen, L. Offense-Defense Distributed Decision Making for Swarm vs. Swarm Confrontation While Attacking the Aircraft Carriers. Drones, 2022, vol. 6, iss. 10, article no. 271. DOI: 10.3390/drones6100271.

Jia, N., Yang, Z,. Liao, T., Dou, Y., & Yang, K. A System Dynamics Model for Analyzing Swarming UAVs Air Combat System. 13th Annual Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE), Paris, France, 2018, pp. 74-81. DOI: 10.1109/SYSOSE.2018.8428707.

Ferrari, J. F., & Chen, M. A mathematical model for tactical aerial search and rescue fleet and operation planning. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, vol. 50, article no. 101680. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101680.

Su, W., Gao, M., Gao, X., & Xuan, Z. A Decision-Making Method for Distributed Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Swarm considering Attack Constraints in the Cooperative Strike Phase. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2023, no. 2023, article no. 6568359. DOI: 10.1155/2023/ 6568359.

Zhang, C., Liu, T., Bai, G., Tao, J., & Zhu, W. A dynamic resilience evaluation method for cross-domain swarms in confrontation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2024, vol. 244, article no. 109904. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109904.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2024.3.06

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.