Heuristic self-organization of knowledge representation and development: analysis in the context of explainable artificial intelligence

Sergiy Dotsenko, Vyacheslav Kharchenko, Olga Morozova, Andrzej Rucinski, Svitlana Dotsenko

Abstract


From the analysis of the main theoretical provisions of heuristic self-organization systems and logical models, it follows that according to O. G. Ivakhnenko's systems of heuristic self-organization, the first task is to determine the factors content “that determine the essence of different images”. These are the images that characterize the objects of a particular subject area. After determining the composition and content of these images, the next problem is solved, namely, the problem of “generating the new successful heuristic”, which in content is a solution that leads to increased accuracy. Note that we are talking about improving the accuracy of solving the problem of data processing. It follows from the above mentioned that heuristic self-organization systems are data processing systems. This allows the multiplicity of heuristics. Heuristics in content correspond to the logical rules applied in heuristic self-organization systems. The main provisions of the heuristic self-organization system theory were developed by O. G. Ivakhnenko in the eighties of the last century, but they remain unnoticed to this day. At this time, the task is to explain why the neural network makes such a decision and not another. Based on this, the concept of “explainability of artificial intelligence” was introduced for artificial intelligence. It is the content of heuristics that forms the structure of the neural network in the form of logical rules and determines the logic of the decision made. It is established that the derivation rule, which is the basis for constructing artificial neural networks, is an abductive rule, which, unfortunately, does not meet the fourth heuristic and does not meet the definition of intelligence: intelligence is the ability to measure things. Unfortunately, none of the neural networks can measure things. From the analysis of the basic rules content of inference, it follows that the dialectical method of inference is general (generating) for the basic logical methods of inference. The difference lies in the composition and content of the middle member of the triangular relationship, namely, in the form of the element combination of the relationship: the transition from one concept to another. The explainability of artificial intelligence refers to the laws of the structure and activity of artificial neural networks. But modern theories of artificial neural networks ignore the existence of logical rules (heuristics), which were established by O. G. Ivakhnenko. After all, only knowing the rules based on which problems are solved, it is possible to check the correctness of the decision, but not by searching for such rules. The three hypotheses about the explainability of artificial intelligence and the theory of machine identification can be further defined as statements or theorems and strictly proved.

Keywords


heuristics; self-organization; knowledge; logical inference; explainable artificial intelligence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Peter, Elger, Eoin, Shanaghy. AI as a Service. Serverless machine learning with AWS. Manning, NY, USA, 2020. 282 p.

Lins, S., Pandl, K. D., Teigeler, H. et al. Artificial Intelligence as a Service. Business Information Systems Engineering, 2021, vol. 63, pp. 441-456. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-021-00708-w.

Meske, Christian., Bunde, Enrico. et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Objectives, Stakeholders, and Future Research Opportunities. Information Systems Management, 2022, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 53-63. DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2020.1849465.

Degas, A., Islam, M.R., Hurter, C.; Barua, S. et al. A Survey on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and eXplainable AI. Air Traffic Management: Current Trends and Development with Future Research Trajectory. Applied Sciences. 2022, vol. 12, no. 1295. pp. 1-47. DOI: 10.3390/app12031295.

Phillips, P. Jonathon., Hahn, Carina A., Fontana, Peter C. et al. Four Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Draft NISTIR 8312, 2020. 24 р. DOI: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8312-draft.

Popov, E. V. Ekspertnyye sistemy: Reshe-niye neformalizovannykh zadach v dialoge s EVM [Expert systems: Resolving non-formalized problems in dialogue with computers]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987, 288 p.

Subbotin, S. O. Podannya y obrobka znanʹ u systemakh shtuchnoho intelektu ta pidtrymky pryynyattya rishenʹ: Navchalʹnyy posibnyk [Representation and processing of knowledge in artificial intelligence systems and decision support: A textbook]. Zaporozhye, ZNTU Publ., 2008. 341 p.

Brown, Carol, O'Leary, Daniel. Introduction to artificial intelligence and expert systems. Artificial Intelligence/Expert Systems. Section of the American Accounting Association, 1995. 14 p.

Naylor, Chris. Build Your Own Expert System. Sigma Technical Press, 1983. 249 p.

Dotsenko, S. Intelektualʹni systemy: pryntsypy evrystychnoyi samoorhanizatsiyi [Intellectual systems: a principle of heuristic self-organization]. Radioelektronni i komp'uterni sistemi – Radioelectronic and computer systems, 2020, no. 1(93), pp. 4-16. DOI: 10.32620/reks.2020.1.01.

Dotsenko, S. Intelektualʹni systemy: pryntsypy evrystychnoyi samoorhanizatsiyi protsesiv smyslovoho myslennya ta smyslovoyi diyalʹnosti [Intellectual systems: principles of heuristic self-organization of the processes of sense thinking and sense activity]. Radioelektronni i komp'uterni sistemi – Radioelectronic and computer systems, 2020, no. 2(94), pp. 4-22. DOI: 10.32620/reks.2020.2.01.

Ivakhnenko A. G., Zaichenko, Yu. P., Dimitrov, V. D. Prinyatie reshenii na osnove samoorganizatsii [Decision making on the basis of self-organization]. Мoscow, Sovetskoe radio Publ., 1976. 280 p.

Anokhin, P. K. Printsipial'nyye voprosy obshchey teorii funktsional'nykh sistem. V kn. Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional'nykh sistem [Fundamental questions of the general theory of functional systems. In book. Essays on the physiology of functional systems]. Moscow, Medicine Publ., 1975. 448 p.

Steinberg, V. E. Teoriya i praktika didakticheskoy mnogomernoy tekhnologii [Theory and practice of didactic multidimensional technology]. Moscow, Public education Publ., 2015. 350 p.

Krogerus, Mikael., Tschäppeler, Roman. The Decision Book: 50 Models for Strategic Thinking. W. W. Norton & Company Publ., 2012. 176 p.

Luger, George F. Artificial intelligence : structures and strategies for complex problem solving. Pearson Education, 2011. 784 р.

Thiebes, S., Lins, S. & Sunyaev, A. Trustworthy artificial intelligence. Electron Markets, 2021, vol. 31, pp. 447-464. DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4.

GOST R 59276-2020 Sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta Sposoby obespecheniya doveriya. Obshchiye polozheniya [Artificial intelligence systems. Methods for ensuring trust. General]. Introduction date 2021-03-01. 12 p.

Ivakhnenko, A. G. Sistemy evristicheskoy samoorganizatsii v tekhnicheskoy kibernetike [Systems of heuristic self-organization in technical cybernetics], Kiev, Tehnika Publ., 1971. 372 p.

Haykin, Simon. Neural Networks and Learning Machines, Pearson, 2009. 936 p.

Phillips, P. Jonathon., Hahn, Carina A., Fontana, Peter C., Broniatowski, David A., Przybocki, Mark A.. Four Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency. Internal Report 8312, 2020. 24 p. DOI: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8312-draft.

DSTU 2481-94. Systemy obroblennya informatsiyi. Intelektualʹni informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi. Terminy ta vyznachennya: Systemy obrabotky ynformatsyy. Yntellektualʹnye ynformatsyonnye tekhnolohyy [Information processing systems. Intelligent information technologies. Terms and definitions: Information processing systems. Intelligent Information Technologies]. Regional edition 1995-01-01, Kyiv, Derzhstandart of Ukraine Publ., 1994. 72 p.

Dotsenko, S. I. Teoretychni osnovy stvorennya intelektual'nykh system komp"yuternoyi pidtrymky rishen' pry upravlinni enerhozberezhennyam orhanizatsiy. Diss. dokt. tekhn. nauk [Theoretical Foundations for Creating Intelligent Computer Support Systems for Managing Energy Saving Organizations Dr. eng. sci. diss.]. Kharkov, Kharkivs'kyy natsional'nyy tekhnichnyy universytet sil's'koho hospodarstva imeni Petra Vasylenka Publ., 2017. 369 p.

Ivakhnenko, A. G. Samoobuchayushchiyesya sistemy raspoznavaniya i avtomaticheskogo upravleniya [Self-learning recognition and automatic control systems]. Kiev, Technique Publ., 1969. 392 p.

Dotsenko, S., Illiashenko, O., Budnichenko, I., Kharchenko, V. Knowledge Management Model Based Approach to Profiling of Requirements: Case for Information Technologies Security Standards. Digital Transformation, Cyber Security and Resilience of Modern Societies. Studies in Big Data, 2021, vol. 84, pp. 255–277. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-65722-2_16.

Dotsenko, S., Illiashenko, O., Kamenskyi, S., Kharchenko, V. Embedding an Integrated Security Management System into Industry 4.0 Enterprise Management: Cybernetic Approach. Digital Transformation, Cyber Security and Resilience of Modern Societies. Studies in Big Data, vol 84, 2021, pp. 279–296. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-65722-2_17.

Lee, David., Yannakakis, Mihalis. Principles and methods of testing finite state machines – a survey. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.380.3405&rep=rep1&type=pdf. (accessed 27.01.2022).

Yakimets, N., Kharchenko, V. 7 Reliable FPGA-Based Systems out of Unreliable Automata: Multi-Version Design Using Genetic Algorithms. Design of Digital Systems and Devices. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, vol. 79, pp. 165-192. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17545-9_7.

Engels, Friedrich. Dialectics of Nature. Lawrence & Wishart Ltd, 1977. 496 p.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2022.1.04

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.