THE DESIGN PRINCIPLES OF MAN-MACHINE INTERACTION IN A DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT

O. Protasenko, G. Mygal, E. Mykhailova

Abstract


Modern society life is inextricably linked with the digital environment. A consequence is the transformation of ergatic systems into digital ones. The result is the emergence of new types of man-machine interaction. The essential feature of such interaction is to minimise human involvement in the ergatic system functioning. According to this, the issues of organising the safe and effective functioning of digital ergatic systems have priority importance. In this regard, the aim was to study the features of man-machine interaction in an actual digital ergatic system. We chose an ergatic system for research. The main elements of the system were students (70 people of the first-year study) and teachers (5 people) of the Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, as well as the digital system “Personal training systems the Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics” (PTS). This digital system is an adapted model of the Moodle digital system. The study found out that the key components that determine the safety and efficiency of the digital ergatic system are the operator's digital mindset, digital tools and digital devices. The study of these components in the system made it possible to establish that it had a balanced state. It is substantiated the optimal form of man-machine interaction in the system. It is mixed learning. It is shown that the tendency to minimise the human role in a digital ergatic system does not always have the expected positive result, which determines the need for further research on this issue. In addition, we analysed the difficulties arising in the design of digital systems. The main reason for this is a lack of developers awareness of the ergonomic and cognitive aspects of man-machine interaction. It is shown that the development of critical thinking and intuition in students is closely related to the individual trajectory of learning. For this, it is essential to update interdisciplinary knowledge. In this case, it is necessary to familiarise students with current concepts and system-forming principles, which are the basis of human factors engineering. It was substantiated that the application of current concepts and system-forming principles in training will allow optimising man-machine interaction. The positive results will be evidence even at the stage of designing digital systems

Keywords


digital environment, operator, ergatic system, safety, design, learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kulesz, O. Culture in the Digital Environment. The United Nations Edu-cational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2017, 64 p.

Raucha, E., Linderb, C., Dallasegaa, P. Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within Industry 4.0. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020. vol. 139, pp. 1-15. doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.018

Stern, H., Becker, T. Concept and Evaluation of a Method for the Integration of Human Factors into Human-Oriented Work Design in Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Sustainability, 2019, 11 (16), 4508. doi:10.3390/su11164508

Briscoe, G., Sadedin, S., De Wilde, P. Digital Ecosystems: Ecosystem-Oriented Architectures. Natural Computing, 2011, 10, 1143. doi.org/10.1007/s11047-011-9254-0

Fonseca, L. M. Industry 4.0 and the digital society: concepts, dimensions and envisioned benefits. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 2018, vol. 12(1), pp. 386-397. doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0034

Reis, J. Z. The Role of Internet of Services (IoS) on Industry 4.0 Through the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA). Springer, Cham. 2018. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99707-0_3

Sun, S. et al. Healthy Operator 4.0: A Human Cyber-Physical System Architecture for Smart Workplaces. Sensors, 2020. 20, 2011. doi.org/10.3390/

s20072011

Soriano, J. et al. Internet of Services. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41569-2_14

Colombo, W. A., Karnouskos, S., Hanisch, C. Engineering human-focused Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems in Industry 4.0. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 2021, pp. 379 (2207):20200366. doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.03662021

Mygal, G. V., Protasenko, O. F. The role of the human factor in manufacturing safety. Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Series: New solutions in modern technology. 2020, no. 1 (3), pp. 60-65, doi:10.20998/2413-4295.2020.03.08.

Reiman, A. et al. Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing in the industry 4.0 context – A scoping. Technology in Society, 2021, vol. 65, 101572. doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101572

Sony, M., Naik, S. Key ingredients for evaluating Industry 4.0 readiness for organizations: a literature review. Benchmarking An International Journal, 2020, vol. 27 (7), pp. 2213-2232. doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0284

Zheng, T. et al. The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 2020, 59 (6), pp. 1922-1954. doi.org/10.1080/00207543.

1824085.

Colli, M. et al. A maturity assessment approach for conceiving context-specific roadmaps in the Industry 4.0 era. Annual Reviews in Control, 2019, 48, pp. 165-177. doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.06.001

Raschke, U. et al. Ergonomics in Digital Environments. In Handbook of Industrial Engineering, 2001. doi.org/10.1002/9780470172339.ch41

Rajeswararao, Kvs., Narahari, N. Future of Ergonomics in the Age of Industry 4.0 – Some Perspectives. Journal of Industrial Safety Engineering, 2020, vol. 6 (3), pp. 14-20.

Mygal, G. V., Protasenko, O. F. New concepts of modern ergonomics. Open information and computer integrated technologies, 2018, no. 79, pp. 162-171.

Protasenko, O. F., Mygal, G. V. The issues of the modern ergonomics6 the structural reliability definition. Municipal economy of cities, 2019, vol. 5 (151), pp. 81-86. doi 10.33042/2522-1809-2019-5-151-81-86

Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J. Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 2009, vol. 325, pp. 284-288. doi:10.1126 / sci-ence.1175626

Freeman, S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415.

Kovalchuk. M. V. Convergence of Science and Technology – a Breakthrough into the Future. Rossijskie nanonekhnologii, 2011, vol. 6, no. 1-2, pp. 13-23.

Mygal, G. V., Mygal, V. P. Cognitive and ergonomics aspects human interac-tions with a computer. Radioelectronics and computer systems, 2020, no. 1 (93), pp. 90-102. doi: 10.32620/reks.2020.1.09

Mygal, G. V., Protasenko, O. F. Human factor engineering in modern educa-tion. Scientific notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University, 2019, vol. 30 (69), no. 6, pp. 1-6. doi.org/10.32838/2663-5941/2019.6-1/01.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/oikit.2021.93.12

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.