PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT OF ANTIQUE EPOCH ON STATE-LEGAL REGULATION OF THE DAILY

Abstract

Everyday life as a sphere of life is considered beyond state and legal regulation, since it belongs to a private, intimate, secretive society and state, which complicates the management and security of state institutions. The political and economic life of the state was not associated with the everyday way of life; based on this position, in the analysis of philosophical, political and legal thought, the author believes that it is impossible to understand and correctly assess the structure and character of the state functioning, if we ignore those values that were given by philosophers, state officials of everyday life for solving their political projects. In addition, the scientific interest in the history of philosophy, state and law is in the fact that how everyday life as an object of state legal regulation and planning was reflected in the views of thinkers.

It is through the study of everyday life that the general laws of the origin, development, functioning and decline of law and state are thoroughly revealed, clarified and explained. Today, the interest in self-study of the philosophical and legal aspect of everyday life is associated with the current tendencies of interference in the private sphere of the individual by the state institutions, which in certain moments legitimately perceive that in the hidden private life there is a potential danger under conditions of external and terrorist threats.
The purpose of the article is to identify the basic principles of legal regulation and organization of everyday life in the state-political constructions of thinkers and statesmen of ancient Greece, Rome and Byzantium as a genetically related state-legal tradition. Thus, the state provides the vital functions of both society and the political system through the normative regulation of the everyday sphere of life. However, in the modern theory of law to form the scope of legal regulation, only relationships that are subject to legal regulation can be regulated. Therefore, it is believed that the law can not regulate the behavior of a person and his personal life. Thinkers and statesmen, however, were convinced that everyday life as a sphere of life and a part of social relations requires the use of legal means to stabilize, streamline social relations and manage social and political processes.

It was for this period of European civilization that characterized the normative-legal regulation and public administration of everyday life, namely for the ancient Greek state-legal thought, which personified Plato – regulation and control of everyday life in order to preserve statehood. For the ancient Romanian state-legal practice organization of everyday life was described by organization of leisure for managing social and political processes in political alienation. Byzantine church-state practice was marked by regulating everyday practices for stabilizing social relations under the conditions of the crisis of statehood by means of canonical right.