TIME DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMIC REFORMS

The prevailing sectoral approach based on agrarian-industrial policy, to the detriment of the socio-spatial direction of the development of rural areas, is ineffective from a social point of view. More correct is an integrated approach, within which rural development is viewed as a process of improving the life of people directly related to the use of land and other biological resources included in the system of geographical division of labor and corresponding social relations. The purpose of the article is to consider the development of rural areas based on a combination of socio-territorial and sectoral approaches. The object of the research is the countryside of the Komi Republic. The example of Komi is interesting in that rural life in the taiga part of its territory has features characteristic of many thoroughly inhabited regions of the North-West, the Urals, Siberia and the Far East, and in the extreme northern part (forest-tundra and tundra) - the western sector of the Arctic. The subject of the research is socio-economic processes in the northern village. Analytical, historical, statistical, logical, comparative methods were used as research methods. The main hypothesis of the study was the revival of rural life as a social process, the management of which cannot be carried out only within the framework of the production sector approach. Highlighting the development of rural areas and the agrarian sector as an object of comprehensive research will improve the quality and standard of living of rural residents. Presentation of the main material. New approaches to rural development are considered, including the transition from the exogenous-sectoral model to both endogenous and neo-endogenous. The impossibility of solving numerous problems of rural areas in the sectoral model of their development is shown. Originality and practical significance of the study. A significant disagreement in the domestic practice of rural development between sectoral and socio-spatial development has been established. The role of the rural economy in the development of the village is investigated, directions of its diversification are proposed. Conclusions and prospects for further research. The obtained results of the study can become the basis for the preparation of Strategies and Programs for the sustainable development of rural areas and its economic entities at the level of the region and
municipalities.

Results of the All-Russian agricultural census of 2016 (2018). In 8 volumes. Vol. 1. The main results of the All-Russian agricultural census of 2016: The main results of the All-Russian agricul-tural census of 2016 for the constituent entities of the Russian Federation / Fed-eral State Service. statistics. Moscow: ISC "Statistics of Russia", 711.

Savchenko, E. (2018). Special mission of agriculture. Agroindustrial complex: economics, management, 1, 4–10.

Modernization of the infrastructure for the development of rural areas. (2016). Team of authors. Syktyvkar: LLC "Komi Republican Printing House", 241.

Fomina, V., Fomin, A. (2019). Assess-ment of the comfort of housing and communal conditions in rural areas of the Komi Republic. North and Market: Formation of the Economic Order, 2, 88–105.

Ivanova, E. V. (2017). Agricultural con-sulting in the system of innovative de-velopment of the agrarian sector of the northern region. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 10 (2), 284–300.

Petrikov, A. V. (2019). Policy of rural development of Russia: directions and mechanisms. Rural territories in the spa-tial development of the country: potential, problems, prospects. Moscow: VIAPI, 3–10.

Mantino, F. (2010). Rural development in Europe. Politics, institutions are local actors from the 1970s to the present day. Transl. from Italian by I. Khramova. Joint publication of the Food and Agri-culture Organization of the United Na-tions and Business Media of the Sole 24 Ore, 272.

Murdoch, J., Pratt, A. C. (1993). Rural studies, Modernism, Postmodernism and the "Post-rural". Journal of Rural Studies, 9 (4), 411–427.

Lowe, P., Murdoch, J. and Ward, N. (1995). Beyond endogenous and exoge-nous models: Networks in rural devel-opment, in J.D. van der Ploeg and G van Dijk (eds.) Beyond Modernization: the Impact of Endogenous Rural Develop-ment. Van Gorcum: Assen, 296.

Ward, N., Atterton, J., Kim, T. Y., Lowe, P., Phillipson J. and Thompson, N. (2005). Universities, the Knowledge Economy and 'Neo-Endogenous Rural Development'. Center for Rural Econo-my Discussion Paper Series, 1, 1–15.

Ploeg, J. D., Dijk, G. (2008). Unfolding Webs: The Dynamics of Regional Rural Development. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 262.

Mantino, F. La riforma delle Politiche di sviluppo iraafe 2014-2020. (2013). Agriregioni Europa, 9 (12).

Hyyrylainen, T. (2010). Governance of localempowerment in Finish rural policy: Collaboration between policy, develop-ment and research h Employment Policy Research Center. EPRC. Hirosaki Uni-versity, Japan. Discussion Paper, 4, 81–94.

Fact sheets on the European Union – 2019. Retrivied from: http: //www.europarl. Europe.ru/factsheets/en

Guinjoan, E., Badia, A. and Tulla, A. F. (2016). The new Paradigm of Rural De-velopment. Territorial Con-Siderations and Reconceptualization using The “Ru-ral Web”. Boletin de la Asociacion de Geografos Espanoles, 71, 495–500.

Kostyaev, A. I. (2018). Conceptual ap-proaches to the development of rural ar-eas taking into account European experi-ence. Agricultural science of the Euro-North-East, 67 (6), 141–148.

Zaslavskaya, T. I., Ryvkina, R. V. (1980). Methodology and methodology of the systemic study of the Soviet village. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 344.

Merzlov, A. V. (2006). Transition to sustainable development of rural areas: theory, methodology and practice. Mos-cow: Publishing house of IG RAS, 308.

Petrikov, A. V. (2006). Stability of rural development. The Economist, 7, 86–93.

Tretyakov, J. I. (2008). Conceptual Foundations of Sustainable Rural Devel-opment. Russian Agricultural Economics, 4, 80–85.