REGIONAL FEATURES OF THE MORTALITY STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION

Лариса Олексіївна Попова, Елена Николаевна Зорина, Наталія Миколаївна Суховеєнко

Abstract


A noticeable increase in the mortality rate of the population in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic updates research in the field of mortality and life expectancy. The article compares the dynamics and mortality rate from the main causes of death in Russia and the Komi Republic on the eve of a pandemic. The aim of the study is to identify regional opportunities for increasing life expectancy due to the characteristics of the structure of mortality by causes. The subject of the research is mortality of the population of Russia and the Komi Republic due to causes of death. Methods used. The study was carried out on the basis of official data from Rosstat for the period 1990-2019, characterized by multidirectional trends in life expectancy. Methods of systemic, statistical and dynamic analysis and comparison were used. The main hypothesis of the study is the assumption of the presence of significant regional reserves for the growth of life expectancy for all major classes of causes of death. Presentation of the main material. In Russia, the period under review is characterized by a decrease in mortality from respiratory diseases, external causes and diseases of the circulatory system, in Komi - only from a group of external causes. But its level and share in the structure of mortality remain higher than the national average - this is still the main reserve for increasing life expectancy. There has been a convergence with the all-Russian parameters of the level and proportion of mortality from cardiovascular diseases, which previously favorably distinguished the region. Komi is characterized by significantly more unfavorable dynamics and mortality rates from diseases of the digestive system and from neoplasms. The republic approached the beginning of the pandemic with a less favorable situation with mortality from respiratory diseases, but with a more favorable situation from infectious and parasitic diseases. The region has reserves for increasing life expectancy for almost all major causes of mortality. Originality and practical significance of the research. Revealing the specifics of the structure of mortality by causes makes it possible to determine regional priorities in demographic policy. Conclusions and prospects for further research. The COVID-19 pandemic has made significant changes in the structure of mortality by cause, which will be the subject of our further research.


Keywords


pandemic, life expectancy of the population, mortality, causes of death, epidemiological transition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Zakharova, O. D. (1995). Demographic crisis in Russia: lessons of history, problems and prospects. Sociological Research, 9, 99-109.

Ivanov, V. N., Suvorov, A. V. (2003). Problems of health protection of the population of Russia. Forecasting Problems, 3, 99-113.

Ivanova, A. E. (1994). Health of the Russian population: expectations, reality, prospects. Demographic development of Russia and its socio-economic consequences. Mater. Int. Conf., Mos-cow: IS RAS.

Popova, L. A. (2014). Evaluation of the effectiveness of state demographic initiatives. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 1(31), 125-137.

Popova, L. A. (2019). Life expectancy of the population of the Komi Republic: reserves for the prolongation of positive trends. Problems of development of the territory, 3 (101), 62-75.

Popova, L. A., Taranenko, N. N. (2017). Northern regions of Russia: the level and structure of mortality. Region: economics and sociology, 4 (96), 77-100.

Preliminary demographic results of 2020 in Russia (part I). Demoscope Weekly, 891-892. Retrieved from http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/ 2021/0891 / index.php.

Prokhorov, B. B. (2001). The health of the population of Russia in the past, present and future. Problems of Forecasting, 1, 148-163.

Semenova, V. G. (2005). Reverse epidemiological transition in Russia. Moscow, 235.

Modern demography (1995) / Ed. AND I. Kvashi, V.A. Iontseva, Moscow, 272.

Stabilization of the population of Russia (opportunities and directions of demographic policy) (2001). Moscow, 262.

Bourgeois-Pichat, J. (1952). Essai sur la mortalite biologique de l'homme. Population, 7, 3, 381-394.

Editorials. (1972). The epidemiologic revolution. American Journal of Public Health, 62, 11, 1439-1441.

Gaziano, J. M. (2010). Fifth phase of the Epidemiologic transition. The age of Obesity and Inactivity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303 (3), 275-276.

Health Care Systems: Rethinking health care systems (2005) / ed. by J. Watson and P. Ovseiko. NY: Taylor & Francis, 697.

Meslé, F., Vallin, J. (2002). La transition sanitaire: tendances et perspectives. Démographie: analyze et synthèse. Sous la direction de G. Caselli, J. Vallin et G. Wunsch, INRD, Vol. III, Chapitre 57, 439-461.

Olshansky, S. J., Ault, A. B. (1986). The fourth stage of the epidemiologic transition: the age of delayed degenerative diseases. Milbank Quarterly, 64, no. 3, 355-391.

Omran, A. R. (1971). The epidemiologic transition: a theory of the epidemiol-ogy of population change. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 49 (4), 509-538.

Omran, A. R. (1998). The epidemiologic transition theory revisited thirty years later. World Health Statistics Quarterly, 51(2-4), 99-119.

Terris, M. (1976). The Epidemiologic Revolution, National Health Insurance and the Role of Health Departments. American Journal of Public Health, 66, 12, 1155-1164.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/cher.2021.2.10

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.