FORMATION OF EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT IS THE VECTOR OF MODERN REFORMS IN UZBEKISTAN

Алішер Файзійович Расулев, Сергій Олексанрович Воронін

Abstract


Formulation of the problem. The use of an effective economic management system allows you to create favorable conditions for achieving long-term economic growth at minimal costs. The purpose of the study is to study foreign experience of economic management reform, review the course of administrative reform in the Republic of Uzbekistan and, on the basis of available data, develop recommendations for the national economy. The subject of this research is the development of the management system of the national economy in the context of the transition to full-fledged market relations. Methods of economic research - system analysis, generalization, scientific abstraction, historical and logical method, classification, etc. The hypothesis of the research is that currently the main vector of reforms in Uzbekistan is optimization and increasing the efficiency of the economic management system. The use of market and administrative instruments will improve the quality parameters of economic development, create conditions for increasing the competitiveness of the economy. Presentation of the main material. The main features of the management reform in various countries of the world are revealed, an analysis of the reform of the national economy management system is made, recommendations for the transition to a full-fledged market are substantiated. The originality and practical significance of the study is that it systematizes the main approaches to the reform of economic management, studies the features of management reform in the Republic of Uzbekistan, substantiates recommendations for increasing its efficiency in the period of overcoming the consequences of forced restrictions and for the future. The conclusions of the study are that “market mechanisms” are just one of many necessary tools to achieve the goals of the country's socio-economic development. Therefore, it is necessary to clearly “outline the boundaries” in which areas the state should introduce market relations, in which to regulate activities and in which - to produce or provide services. When developing a new system of economic management, it is necessary to include tasks for both the development of market institutions and administrative procedures. When carrying out the privatization of enterprises engaged in the extraction of minerals and their primary processing, the controlling stake must be retained by the state. The main resource of the country is the accumulated human potential, which requires special attention from the state during the reform process. The new economic management system must be ready to respond promptly to internal and external challenges

Keywords


government support; budget resources, institutional factors, market, transformation

Full Text:

PDF

References


On measures for the accelerated reform of enterprises with the participation of the state and the privatization of state assets. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated October 20, 2020 No. UP-6096. Retrieved from: https://www.lex.uz/docs/

On measures for cardinal renewal of state policy in the sphere of economic development and poverty reduction. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated March 26, 2020 No. UP-5975. Retrieved from: https://www.lex.uz/docs/4778531

On improving monetary policy with a gradual transition to inflation targeting. Presidential Decree № 5877 dated November 18, 2019. Retrieved from: https://lex.uz/docs/4600826

On approval of the Concept of administrative reform in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Decree of the President of September 8, 2017 № UP-5185. Retrieved from: https://www.lex.uz/acts/3331176

Mirziyoyev Sh. Speech by the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan at the meeting dedicated to the 29th anniversary of Uzbekistan's independence. Retrieved from: https://president.uz/ru/lists/view/3824. (Date of treatment 09/01/2020)

Asadov H. How to make the government effective? Retrieved from: https://repost.uz/government (Date of treatment 08/15/2020)

The World Bank lowered its forecast for GDP growth in Uzbekistan. Retrieved from: https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2020/06/09/outlook/

Ignatova, T. (2003). The relationship between the state policy of sustainable development and taxation. Rostov-on-Don.

How does Uzbekistan fight against pandemias? Interview with Director of CEIR O. Khakimov. Retrieved from: https://review.uz/ru/post/kak-uzbekistan-boretsya-s-pandemiey (Date of access 14.07.2020)

The Ministry of Finance reported on the growth of budget spending. Education suffered the most. Retrieved from: https://telegra.ph/informaciya-o-kontrolnyh-meropriyatiyah-provedennyh-Departamentom-gosudarstvennogo-finansovogo-kontrolya-v-1-m-polugodii-2020-go-07-16 (Date of treatment 08.06.2020)

The ILO assessed the impact of COVID-19 on the socio-economic situation in Uzbekistan. Retrieved from: https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2020/08/20/survey/ (Date of treatment 08.01.2020)

Polterovich, V. Lessons from the reforms of the 1990s. Retrieved from: https://iq.hse.ru/news/177672764.html

Action program of the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 01/21/2020 Retrieved from: https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2020/01/23/aripov-program/

Rasulev, A., Voronin, S. and Mukhitdinov, Z. (2020). Modernization of the tax system of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Moscow: Society and Economy, 6, 53–63.

Shenin, S. (2008). Harvard's Russian Project: From Triumph to Shame. Saratov University Bulletin. T. 8. Ser. History. International relationships.

Hudson, J. A. (1999). Generalized Theory of Output Determination. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 21(4), 663-678

Levinson, M. (2000). The Cracking Washing-ton Consensus. Dissent, 47 (4),13.

Peterson, W. C. (1996). Macroeconomics and the Theory of the Monetary Economy. Political Economy for the 21st. Century: Contemporary Views on the Trend of Economics. ARMONK, NY: M.E. SHARPE, 151-170.

Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E. and Svejnar J. (2009). Effects of Privatization and Owner-ship in Transition Economies. The World Bank, 28.

Wacziarg, R., Welch, K. (2003). Trade Liberalization and Growth. Stanford University's Graduate School of Business. Retrieved from: www.stanford.edu/~wacziarg/downloads/integration.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/cher.2020.4.07

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.