TIME DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMIC REFORMS

The systemic crisis of society and its economic component has shown the need to revise the methodology of economics. The purpose of the article is to generalize the prerequisites for the formation and development of methodological support for removing the critical situation of domestic economics and practice. The methodological basis of the study is based on the ideas of prominent scientists and practitioners, methods of dialectics, system-synergetic and interdisciplinary approaches to the analysis of the methodology of economics. The main hypothesis of the study was the assumption that the clarification of the functions and elemental composition of the methodology of economics will provide constructive discussions on its development and adaptation to domestic conditions. Presenting main material. The loss of control over the system of economics and practice requires a revision of technologies for their study based on methodological pluralism, focused on identifying opportunities for transformation of the economy focused on production of goods in the economy of expanded reproduction of potential human capacity to respond to unconventional situations. The originality and practical significance of the study lies in identifying the limitations and contradictions of the proposed ways to update individual scientific paradigms and their systems in the format of a metaparadigm, providing a systematic justification of the theoretical foundations of the methodology of economics and practice by defining the essence of , specifically. The offered list of functions and elemental structure of methodology of economic science creates an initial basis of their discussion and specification in discussions and educational processes. Conclusions and prospects of further researches. The effectiveness of the methodology of economics depends on the constructive dialogue of stakeholders in its renewal. The initial stage of the dialogue should be to agree on the interpretation of its functions and content. Prospects for further research are related to the development of reforms, building their logical matrix, which will contribute to the reform of society in general and its economic subsystem in particular.

Bulekbaev, S. B. (2016). On the meth-odological crisis of social science in the context of modern challenges. Knowledge. We understand. Skill, 1, 44–56.

Ivakhnenkov, S. V., Conber, J. (2015). Approaches of US scientists to the methodology of science: a study plan to reform business research in Ukraine. Scientific notes of NaUKMA. Economic sciences, 172, 33-38.

Zveryakov, M. I. (2015). Economic the-ory in terms of new historical challenges. Logical and historical foundations of paradigmatic shifts in economic theory of the XXI century. Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 1, 18-22.

Stryzhak, О. О. (2015). Ontological pre-conditions for the study of socio-economic reality. Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kyiv: Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University, 1, 130-132.

Malyi, I. Y. (2015). The influence of in-formation and globalization expansions on the diffusion of economics. Paradig-matic shifts in economic theory of the XXI century. Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kyiv: Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University, 1, P. 59–62.

Tomchuk-Ponomarenko, N. V. (2015). Modern directions of theoretical and practical research in economic theory Paradigmatic shifts in economic theory of the XXI century. Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kyiv: Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University, 1, 150–153.

Glazyev, S. Yu. (2016). About a new paradigm in economics. Economic Sci-ence of Modern Russia, 3, 7-16.

Shvetsov, Yu. G. (2015). Scientific in-solvency of modern economic theory. Problems of modern economy, 2(54), P. 53–57.

Shvetsov, Yu. (2016). Spiritual and mor-al insolvency of modern economic theory. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Economics, (34), 262-288.

Galchynsky, A. (2012). Economic de-velopment: the methodology of the up-dated paradigm. Economy of Ukraine, 5, 4–17.

Balatsky, E. V. (2003). Anthropogenic factor of "regression" of economic sci-ence. Science, 4, 142–163.

Balatsky, E. (2006). Dialectics of knowledge and a new paradigm of eco-nomic science. World Economy and In-ternational Relations, 7, 73–79.

Kolpakov, V. A. (2008). Economic theo-ry in search of a new paradigm. Humani-ties: theory and methodology. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 1, 79–88.

Ryazanov, V. T. (2004). The problem of verification in economic theory. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University, 4, 3–21.

Bazilevich, V., Ilyin, V. Economic and philosophical thought of the modern world. Кyiv: Knowledge, 821.

Dobronravova, I. S., Rudenko, O. V. & Sidorenko, L. I. (2018). Methodology and organization of scientific research. Kyiv: Ukrainian Orthodox Church "Kyiv University", 607.

Bilotserkivets, V. V., Zavgorodnya, O. O. (2009). Evolution of methodological bases of research of new economy: from stochastic perception to algorithmization of knowledge. Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University, 4, 6–13.

Kolot, A. (2014). Interdisciplinary ap-proach as a prerequisite for the devel-opment of economic science and educa-tion. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Na-tional University of Kyiv Economics, 5(158), 18–21.

Stryzhak, E. О. (2013). Methodological pluralism in modern economic theory. Bulletin of NTU "KhPI", 53(1026), 143–149.

Furman, A. V. (2016) Idea and content of professional methodology: monograph. Ternopil: THEY, 378.

Tarelkin, Y. P., Tsykin, V. O. (2010). Methodology of scientific research: Sumy: Sumy-PU Publishing House named after AS Makarenko, 196.

Klimenko, M. O., Feshchenko, V. P. & Voznyuk, N. M. (2010). Fundamentals and methodology of scientific research. Кyiv: Agriculture education, 351.