EFFECTIVENESS OF TAX BENEFITS IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS

Ірина Анатоліївна Конончук, Ірина Олександрівна Пригодич, Олексанр Володимирович Києвич

Abstract


Formulation of the problem. The problems of applying tax benefits are one of the most controversial and controversial in the architecture of building the tax system of the state. The multifaceted perception of their need, focus, choice of priorities, implementation conditions, and other equally complex elements of the system of tax benefits has given rise to many questions that the theory and practice of taxation are not able to unambiguously answer. The purpose of the article is to study the features of the application of tax benefits in the Republic of Belarus, as well as to determine the effectiveness of their application. Object of study - features and practical procedures for the establishment of tax benefits in the Republic of Belarus. Methods used in the study. The use of the induction method allowed us to identify areas for improving the procedures for determining the effectiveness of the application of tax benefits. Research hypothesis. The negative trend in the effectiveness of tax incentives is partly due to limiting objective factors. Statement of the main material. The implementation of the economic function of taxes, the existence of which is indicated by the comprehensive nature of taxes, involves the use of leverage or tax benefits in various forms in the fabric of taxation. And despite the presence of many negative effects of tax benefits (a distorting effect on the distribution of resources, irrationality of the structure of the tax burden, an increase in tax administration costs), states actively use them as a tool for solving socio-economic problems. The huge number of benefits characteristic of the tax system of the Republic of Belarus provided for by various regulatory legal acts predetermined the need for their adjustment and assessment of their effectiveness. The article considers certain tax preferences that are provided in order to support and develop the country's priorities and areas of activity. Originality and practical value. The study of the peculiarities of special taxation regimes used by small and medium-sized businesses, agricultural organizations, allowed us to conclude that with low profitability of payers, the construction of tax relations based on them is not a condition for reducing tax obligations. Conclusions. To increase the efficiency of the simplified tax system from the standpoint of minimizing the tax burden on payers, it is proposed to reduce the existing tax rates. Comprehensive government support for the IT sector, including in the form of tax incentives, allowed HTP residents to significantly increase profitability and provide increased opportunities for their growth.

Keywords


tax incentives, simplified tax system, single tax, IT-sphere, agriculture, small business

References


Kievich, A.V. & Kononchuk, I.A. & Prigodich I.A. (2018). The Role of the state in stimulating innovation in the Republic of Belarus . Economic Sciences : scientific information journal , № (168) , P. 52 -58.

Park of high technologies Retreived from: http://www.park.by. Date of access: 23.01.2020.

Kievich, A. V. (2012). The main reason – the mechanism of the global economic crisis . Sankt -Peterburg, SPB: Info -da, 236.

National statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus Retreived from: http://belstat.gov.by/ Date of access: 28.01.2020 [in Russian].

Zhuk, I. N. (2016). Features of managing foreign economic activity of Belarusian organizations in modern conditions. Russian economy: a view to the future: collection of materials of the II International scientific and practical (correspondence) conference, Tambov, February 18, 2016. Tambov state University. G. R. Derzhavin; responsible editor: J. Yu Radukov. Tambov, 569-577.

Kononchuk, I. A. (2018). Tax exemption in the conditions of the credit method of VAT calculation. Economics and bank, № 1, 19 -24.

Tax code of the Republic of Belarus (Special part): code of the Republic of Belarus. (2020). Belarus, 29 Dec. 2009, No. 71 -Z: passed by the House of representatives on 11 Dec. 2009: approved. Council REP. 18 Dec. 2009: in the ed. Of the law Rep. Belarus from 30.12.2018. Consultant Plus: Belarus. Technology 3000. Resp. Belarus. Minsk . [in Russian].

Kievich, A. V. & Prigodich, I. A. Kononchuk, I. A . (2018). Transformation of tax systems on the example of the states – members of the European Union. Journal of the economic reforms, № 4 (32), P. 31–38.

Kisel, I. A. (2012). Features used by organizations of the Republic of Belarus methods of tax planning. Vestnik PGU - News PGU, 5, 69 -73.

Prigodich, I. A. (2019). Rratings of banks of the Republic of Belarus in 2018, compiled according to the reporting in accordance with the Republic of Belarus legislation. Economics and bank, 1, 1 .




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/cher.2020.1.09

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.