Development and validation of a CFD model prediction of temperature separation in swirling fluid flows

Artem Karpenko, Yuriy Torba

Abstract


In this study, a numerical model was developed for performing 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the total temperature separation phenomenon in rotating flows, and the accuracy of this model was validated. This study aims to confirm that the CFD simulation results accurately reflect the physical processes occurring in a real swirling fluid flow. This study examines a rotating fluid flow in a counterflow Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube. The commercial three-dimensional CFD solver Ansys CFX 2024 R2 is used for calculations in a steady-state formulation. To determine the required mesh resolution, a grid convergence study was conducted using the Grid Convergence Index (GCI). The obtained indicators meet the GCI requirements in detailed studies with low error margins (GCI ≤ 5%). The selected mesh for further calculations comprises 13 million elements. This study includes simulations of the vortex tube at various cold stream mass fractions and with different turbulence models. Specifically, the standard k-ε model, the Shear Stress Transport (SST) model, and two Reynolds Stress Models were considered: the Baseline Reynolds Stress Model (BSL RSM) and the Speziale-Sarkar-Gatski Reynolds Stress Model (SSG RSM). The results of the 3D CFD simulations were compared with experimental data, particularly analyzing the difference in total temperatures between the hot and cold outlets of the vortex tube at varying static pressures at the hot outlet. Based on the analysis, all considered turbulence models are capable of detecting the total temperature separation in rotating flows. However, the standard k−ε turbulence model demonstrated the best agreement with the experimental data in terms of the degree of temperature separation. Therefore, it is recommended for use in energy separation calculations in rotating flows.

Keywords


validation; turbulence model; grid convergence; CFD; experiment; total temperature separation; vortex effect; Ranque effect

References


Jauregui, R., & Silva, F. Numerical validation methods. Numerical Analysis - Theory and Application. 2011. DOI: 10.5772/23304.

Godoy, L., & Dardati, P. Validación de modelos en mecánica computacional. Mecanica Computacional,– 2001, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 663–670. Available at: https://amcaonline.org.ar/ojs/index.php/mc/article/view/1854/0. (accessed 10.6.2025).

Jones, W. P., & Launder, B. E. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1972, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 301–314. DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2.

CFX-Solver Theory Guide. – 2.8.1.1 Scalable Wall Functions. – Ansys, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, 2024.

Dincer, K., & et al. Experimental investigation of the performance of a Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube with regard to a plug located at the hot outlet. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2009, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 87–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2008.06.002.

Skye, H. M., Nellis, G. F., & Klein, S. A. Comparison of CFD analysis to empirical data in a commercial vortex tube. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2006, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 71–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2005.05.004.

Celik, I. B., & et al. Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, vol. 130, no. 7, article no. 078001. DOI: 10.1115/1.2960953.

Menter, F. R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering. AIAA Journal, 1994, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1598–1605. DOI: 10.2514/3.12149.

Chou, P. Y. On velocity correlations and the solutions of the equations of turbulent fluctuation. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1945, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 38–54. DOI: 10.1090/qam/11999.

Rotta, J. Statistische Theorie nichthomogener Turbulenz. Zeitschrift f r Physik, 1951, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 547–572. DOI: 10.1007/bf01330059.

Speziale, C. G., Sarkar, S., & Gatski, T. B. Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1991, vol. 227, pp. 245–272. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112091000101.

Dutta, T., Sinhamahapatra, K. P., & Bandyopdhyay, S. S. Comparison of different turbulence models in predicting the temperature separation in a Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2010, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 783–792. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.12.014.

Matveev, K. I., & Leachman, J. Numerical investigation of vortex tubes with extended vortex chambers. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2019, vol. 108, pp. 145–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.08.030.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2025.6.02