Estimation of the service life of aircraft panel structures under random crack growth rates

Sergey Ignatovich, Iryna Dzhavadova

Abstract


The stochastic nature of fatigue crack growth rates must be considered when predicting the cyclic service life of aircraft fuselage skin structures. This study proposes a modelling approach based on the Paris power-law relationship. Analysis of empirical data from various literature sources demonstrates that a linear inverse correlation exists between the Paris law coefficients C and m for a wide range of structural aluminium alloys, wherein log C decreases as m increases. Based on this dependence, we propose a modified fatigue crack growth model that uses only one governing parameter: the exponent m. This contrasts with the conventional Paris equation, which uses two governing parameters. The crack propagation behavior is represented as random by treating m as a random variable. Numerical simulations were performed for crack growth in sheet structures under the assumption of a uniformly distributed random exponent m, and the operating stress range was calculated using actual fuselage geometry. The resulting predictions define the structural life until the critical crack length is reached, corresponding to the material’s fracture toughness. The minimum service life across all random realizations of m within the specified range provides a conservative and practical prediction metric. A parametric numerical study was carried out for multiple stress ranges to account for variable loading conditions. The shortest predicted life to critical crack growth was determined for each case, assuming a constant initial half-crack length of 0.003 m. The relationship between the minimum residual life and applied stress range exhibits a linear trend in semi-logarithmic coordinates, with a correlation coefficient equal to one.

Keywords


fatigue crack; Paris law coefficients; aluminum alloys; residual life; structural panels

References


Goranson, U. G. Damage Tolerance Facts and Fic-tion. International Conference on Damage Tolerance of Aircraft Structures. International Conference on Damage Tolerance of Aircraft Structures, 2007, no. 11. 11 p.

Castro, P. M. S. T., Tavares, S. M. O., Richter-Trummer, V., & Costa, J. D. Damage tolerance of aircraft panels. Mecânica Experimental, 2010, vol. 18, pp. 35-46.

Proppe, C. Probabilistic analysis of multi-site damage in aircraft fuselages. Computational Mechanics, 2003, vol. 30, pp. 323-329. doi: 10.1007/s00466-002-0408-x.

Cavallini, G., & Lazzeri, R. A probabilistic approach to fatigue design of aerospace components by using the risk assessment evaluation. In book: Recent advances in aircraft technology, 2012, pp. 29-48. doi: 10.5772/37784.

Pattabhiraman, S., Kim, N. H., & Haftka, R. T, Effects of uncertainty reduction measures by structural health monitoring on safety and lifecycle cost of airplanes. In: Procedia of 51st Conf. «AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials», 2010, AIAA-2010-2677. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-2677.

Coppe, A., Haftka, R. T., Kim, N. H., & Yuan, F.-G. Uncertainty reduction of damage growth properties using structural health monitoring, Journal of Aircraft, 2010, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2030-2038. doi: 10.2514/1.C000279.

Wang, Y., Luo, J., & Daigle, M., Sankararaman, S. Predictive air frame maintenance strategies using model-based prognostics, Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2018, vol. 232, no. 6, pp. 690-709. doi: 10.1177/1748006X18757084.

Giannella, V. On the statistical nature of fatigue crack-growth through Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, vol. 1214. 8 p. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1214/1/012020.

Ciavarella, M., Paggi, M., & Carpinteri, A. One, no one, and one hundred thousand crack propagation laws: A generalized Barenblatt and Botvina dimensional analysis approach to fatigue crack growth, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2008, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 3416–3432. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.09.002.

Ignatovich, S. R., & Karan E. V. Fatigue crack growth kinetics in D16AT aluminum alloy specimens with multiple stress concentrators. Strength of Materials, 2015, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 586-594. doi: 10.1007/s11223-015-9694-3.

Carpinteri, A., & Paggi, M. Are the Paris’ law parameters dependent on each other? Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 2007, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 10-16. doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.02.02.

Ihnatovych, S. R., Karuskevych, M. V., Yutskevych, S. S., Karan, Ye. V., & Dzhavadova, I. I. Prohnozuvannya zalyshkovoyi dovhovichnosti konstruktsiy z alyuminiyevykh splaviv pry vypadkoviy shvydkosti zrostannya vtomnykh trishchyn [Prediction of residual fatigue life of aluminum alloy structures under random fatigue crack growth rate]. Problemy mitsnosti - Strength of Materials, 2025, vol. 1, pp. 52–64. (in Ukrainian).

Baker, M., & Stanley, I. Assessing and modelling the uncertainty in fatigue crack growth in structural steels, HSE Research Report RR643, 2008. 99 p.

Sinclair, G. B., & Pierie, R. V. On obtaining fatigue crack growth parameters from the literature, International Journal of Fatigue, 1990, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 57-62. doi: 10.1016/0142-1123(90)90343-D.

Bergner, F., & Zouhar, G. A new approach to the correlation between the coefficient and the exponent in the power law equation of fatigue crack growth, International Journal of Fatigue, 2000, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 229-239. doi: 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00123-1.

Coppe, A., Pais, M. J., Haftka, R. T., & Kim, N. H. Using a simple crack growth model in predicting remaining useful life, Journal of Aircraft, 2012, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1965-1973. doi: 10.2514/1.C031808.

Dzhavadova, I. Metody vyznachennya koefitsiyentiv intensyvnosti napruzhen' u aviatsiynykh konstruktsiyakh [Stress intensity factor determination methods for aircraft structures]. Aviatsiyno-kosmichna tekhnika i tekhnolohiya - Aerospace technic and technology, 2024, vol. 4 (196), pp. 24–33. doi: 10.32620/aktt.2024.4.03. (in Ukrainian).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2025.4sup2.07