Test problem of flow modelling in the Rotor 37 compressor stage

Andrii Duliepov, Yevhenіі Hlobin, Artem Kovtun, Mykhailo Khyzhniak, Kateryna Balalaieva

Abstract


The subject of the study is the dependence of the degree of pressure increase on the airflow in the impeller of the axial compressor degree. The object of study is the Rotor 37 axial compressor. The purpose of this study was to select a turbulent viscosity model when conducting a test task in the Rotor 37 compressor. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were solved: to create a three-dimensional model of the object under study; develop a grid model of the object under study; to simulate the flow in a certain range of air flow; to compare the data of numerical and physical experience; evaluate the flow visualization in the Rotor 37 axial compressor stage for all studied turbulent viscosity models. When studying the flow in the stage of the axial compressor Rotor 37, the numerical experiment method was used. The flow simulation was carried out by solving the system of Navier-Stokes equations, which was closed by the turbulent viscosity model. The study used seven turbulent viscosity models: k-ε, k-ε EARSM, SST, BSL, BSL Reynolds Stress, SSG Reynolds Stress, and QI Reynolds Stress. For simulation, a computational grid was built with the adaptation of the boundary layer. This study presents the results of a flow simulation test problem in the Rotor 37 compressor. The results of the study show that all the tested turbulent viscosity models can be used to simulate the flow in an axial compressor. However, the flow calculation with the SSG Reynolds Stress turbulent viscosity model has the smallest error. An analysis of the visualization of streamlines in the interblade channel of the Rotor 37 compressor showed that in all cases, the flow pattern with all turbulent viscosity models is similar. Some differences are observed when modeling the flow with the BSL Reynolds Stress and SST turbulence models. An important factor that should also be taken into account when modeling is the calculation time. In this case, the shortest calculation time was observed for simulation with SST model. Scientific novelty and practical significance is that new data were obtained when testing the following turbulent viscosity models: k-ε, k-ε EARSM, SST, BSL, BSL Reynolds Stress, SSG Reynolds Stress, QI Reynolds Stress. The results obtained made it possible to choose a turbulent viscosity model for further research.

Keywords


compressor; Rotor 37; turbulent viscosity model; flow simulation; pressure increase rate; calculation error; test problem

References


Bailly, C. & Comte-Bellot, G. Turbulence. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2015. 360 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16160-0.

Yusuf, S. N. A., Asako, Y., Che Sidik, N. A., Mohamed, S. B. & Aziz Japar, W. M. A. А Short Review on RANS Turbulence Models. CFD Letters, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 11, pp. 83-96. DOI: 10.37934/cfdl.12.11.8396.

Chaouat, B. The State of the Art of Hybrid RANS/LES Modeling for the Simulation of Turbulent Flows. Flow Turbulence Combustion, 2017, vol. 99, pp. 279-327. DOI: 10.1007/s10494-017-9828-8.

Bose, S. T. & Park, G. I. Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation for Complex Turbulent Flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, vol. 50, pp. 535-561. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045241.

Aftab, S. M. A., Mohd Rafie, A. S., Razak, N. A. & Ahmad, K. A. Turbulence Model Selection for Low Reynolds Number Flows. PLos ONE, 2016, vol. 11, iss. 4. 15 p. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153755.

Papadogiannis, D. & Garnaud, X. Unstructured Large Eddy Simulations of the transonic compressor Rotor 37. 23rd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 5-9 June 2017, Denver, Colorado, Article No. AIAA–2017-3612. 10 p. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3612.

Georgacopoulou, Z. Aerodynamic Analysis of Rotor 37 using CFD. Рiraeus university of applied sciences school of technological applications Mechanical Engineering, 2015. 70 p.

Royce, D. Moore. & Lonnie, Reid. Performance of single-stage axial flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, respectively, and with desing pressure ratio of 2.05, NASA Technical Paper 1659, the United States of America, 1980. 102 p.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2023.4.09