Pilot site of experts’ attitude to the characteristics significance of the attractiveness for innovation of objects of intellectual property

Станіслав Володимирови Яроцький

Abstract


Modern technology transfer is associated, inter alia, with the selection and implementation into production of the objects of intellectual property. At the same time, proactive assessment of the investors’ or experts’ attitude to the characteristics and indicators of these objects determines the appropriate "order" and promotes more effective interaction between the producers and the users of intellectual property. The experts’ preference patterns as the ordered series of many characteristics of attractiveness for innovation of objects of intellectual property are one of the indicators of human influence on decision-making about the degree of acceptability of a particular object and should be used to implement the method of successive concessions based on the pattern recognition methodology, "glob pattern/masks" of this acceptability. The research involved m = 90 highly qualified specialists who are constantly involved in UkrISTEI to provide various expert examinations. A more up-to-date list of n=18 characteristics of attractiveness for innovation of objects of intellectual property has been formed, which allows to study these objects comprehensively and to the fullest extent. The pairwise comparison and normative method of establishing part of the total value (significance, acceptability) of these characteristics were used by the experts, who took part in the research. They built individual systems of preferences, which were then aggregated into a group preference pattern using a group decision-making strategy such as summarizing and grade averaging. Verification of consistency of the group preference pattern revealed that the obtained empirical value of the Kendall's coefficient of concordance is statistically valid at an unusually high level of significance of  a= 1% as for human factor studies.  However, it does not satisfy the criterion for the minimum acceptable value: Wemp.=0,4772<Wmin=0,7. The ways of further research related to the application of multi-step technology of detection and elimination of marginal thoughts while eliminating the statistical error of the "survivor", as well as improving the group preference pattern where the classical Savage’s criterion in decision-making and the Kemeni median are applied.

Keywords


technology transfer; decision-making; the method of successive concessions; characteristics objects of intellectual property; experts’ preference patterns

References


Huberskyi, L. V. Ukrainska dyplomatychna entsyklopediia: Peredacha tekhnolohiy [Technology transfer. Ukrainian diplomatic encyclopedia]. Kyiv, Znannia Ukrainy Publ., 2004, vol. 2. 812 p.

Utkin, V. F., Kryuchkov, Yu. V. Nadezhnost' i effektivnost' v tekhnike. Vol. 3. Еffektivnost' tehnicheskih sistem [Technological Reliability and Effectivenes. Vol. 3. Effectiveness of Engineering Systems]. Moscow, Mashinostroyenie Publ., 1988. 328 p.

Evlanov, L. G., Kutuzov V. A. Ekspertnye otsenki v upravlenii [Expert assessments in management]. Moscow, Economics Publ., 1998. 146 p.

Gorelik, A. L., Skripkin, V. A. Metody raspoznavaniya [The methods of recognition]. 4th ed. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1984. 262 p.

Zayats', V. M., Kamins'kyy, R. M. Metody rozpiznavannya obraziv [Pattern recognition methods]. Lviv. National university «Lvivska politekhnika» Publ., 2004. 173 p.

Fomyn, Ya. A. Raspoznavanie obrazov: teoriya i primeneniya [Pattern recognition methods: theory and application]. 2nd ed. Moscow, FAZYS Publ., 2012. 429 p.

Kozeletskii, Yu, Biryukova, B. V. Psihologicheskaja teorija reshenij [Psychological decision theory]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1979. 504 p.

Lakin, G. F. Byometryia [Biometrics]. Moscow, Vyschaya Shkola Publ., 1990. 352 p.

Orlov, A. I. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskoe modelirovanie. Ekspertnye otsenki [Organizational and economic modeling. Expert assessments]. Moscow, Bauman MSTU Publ., 2011. 486 p.

Reva, O. M., Kamyshyn, V. V., Borsuk, S. P., Nevynitsyn, A. M., Shulhin, V. A. Lyuds'kyy chynnyk: Metodolohiya proaktyvnoyi kvalymetriyi zahroz pomylok aviadyspetcheriv [Human factor: methodology of proactive qualimetry of danger of errors of air traffic controllers]. Kyiv, UkrINTEI Publ., 2020. 126 p.

Sidorenkov, A. V., Sidorenkova, I. I. Effektivnost' malykh grupp v organizatsii. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie i organizatsionno-deyatel'nostnye aspekty [Effectiveness of small groups in the organization. Social psycological and organizational action-oriented aspects]. Rostov-on-Don, YuFU Publ., 2011. 256 p.

Müller, P. Heinz, Neumann, P., Storm, R., Tafeln der mathe-matischen Statistik. VEB Fachbuchverlag, Leipzig 1973. 279 p. (Russ. ed. Myuller, P., Noiman P., Shtorm R. Tablitsy po matematicheskoi statistike Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ. 1982. 278 p.).

Kamyshn, V. V., Reva, O. M. Metody systemnoho analizu u kvalimetriyi navchal'no-vykhovnoho protsesu [Methods of system analysis in the qualimetry of the educational process]. Kyiv, TOV «Informatsiini systemy» Publ., 2012. 270 p.

Reva, A. N., Nasyrov, Sh. Sh., Myrzoev, B. M., Nedbai, S. V. Defazzifikatsiya lingvisticheskikh pokazatelei nezhelatel'nykh sobytii dlya polucheniya ikh integrativnoi otsenki (na primere kharakternykh oshibok aviadispetcherov) [Defuzzification of linguistic indicators of undesirable events for receiving their integrative assessment (on the example of air traffic controllers’ typical errors)]. Tezy «13th Mizhnarodnyj konhres dvyhunobudivnykiv» [Abstracts of “13th International congress of engineers building”], 2018, pp. 74.

Reva, O. M., Kamyshyn, V.V., Nevynitsyn, A.M., Shul'hin, V.A. Aprobatsiya dyferentsial'noho pidkhodu do vyznachennya nebezpek pomylok aviadyspetcheriv u profesiyniy diyal'nosti [Differential approach testing of hazard identification of air traffic controllers’ errors in their professional activity]. Materialy 10 Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. “Suchasni enerhetychni ustanovky na transporti, tekhnolohiyi ta obladnannya dlya yikh obsluhovuvannya SEUTTOO-2019” [Proc. 10th Int. Sci. Pract. Conf. “Modern transport power plants, technologies and maintenance equipment SEUTTOO-2019:]. Kherson, 2019, pp. 304-307. (In Ukrainian).

Reva, O. M., Kamyshyn, V. V., Nevynitsyn, A. M., Shul'hin, V. A. Differential method for establishing a comparative danger of air traffic controllers errors in professional activity]. Nauka, tekhnolohii, innovatsii, 2019, no. 3(11), pp. 70-82. DOI: 10.35668/2520-6524-2019-3-08.

Parkinson, S. N. Parkinson's Law, Boston, Houghton, 1957. 122 p. (Russ. ed.: Parkinson, S. N. Zakony Parkinsona. Moskow, Prohress Publ., 1989. 448 p.

Tarasov, V. A., Gerasimov, B. M., Levin, I. A., Kornejchuk, V. A. Intellektual'nye sistemy podderzhki prinyatiya reshenii: Teoriya, sintez, effektivnost' [Intelligent information technology to support decision-making: Theory, Synthesis, Effectiveness]. Kiev, MAKYS Publ. 2007. 336 p.

Nasirov, Sh. Sh. Bahatokrokova protsedura vyyavlennya statystychno-uzhodzhenoyi systemy perevah aviadyspetcheriv na mnozhyni kharakternykh pomylok yikh diyal'nosti [Multistep procedure for identifying a statistically consistent system of preferences of air traffic controllers on a set of characteristic errors of their activities]. Komunal'ne hospodarstvo mist, 2012. no. 105, pp. 461–475.

Reva, O. M., Kamyshyn, V. V., Nevynitsyn, A. M., Radetska, S. V. Bahatokrokova protsedura pryynyattya rishen' shchodo uzhodzhenosti hrupovykh system perevah aviadyspetcheriv [Multistep decision-making procedure regarding the consistency of group systems of preferences of air traffic controllers]. Materialy 11th Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. «Tekhnichne rehuliuvannia, metrolohiia, informatsiini ta transportni tekhnolohii» [Proc. 11th Int. Sci. Pract. Conf. “Technical regulation, metrology, informational and transport technologies”]. Odesa, 2019. pp. 147-152. (In Ukrainian).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2021.4sup2.15