Mathematical model of riveted joint multiple site damage

Сергей Ромуальдович Игнатович, Александр Сергеевич Якушенко, Владимир Сергеевич Краснопольский, Евгений Игоревич Годына

Abstract


Multiple Site Damage (MSD) is one of the significant damaging factors that limit the airworthiness of aging fleet aircrafts. In case of MSD multiple fatigue cracks initiates and propagates at the rivet holes. Those cracks are relatively short in length, but with a sufficiently large number of them and an unfavorable arrangement along the rivet joint, they can join together and form a crack of a dangerous length. To prevent this type of damage it is necessary to have adequate methods for predicting the boundary state of riveted joints during MSD. A useful approach is a numerical experiment based on Monte-Carlo simulation of the MSD main random factors – the formation of initial cracks and their growth. This paper presents a probabilistic model for predicting the initial stage of MSD – destruction of at least one bridge between the adjacent holes. A level I model is considered, which describes the process of fatigue failure of specimens without rivets but with multiple holes, which are typical for riveted joints. The initiation of fatigue cracks and their growth are modeled taking into account the laws of damage development obtained experimentally on specimens with multiple cracks. So, to simulate the random initiation of cracks in time the Weibull distribution is used. The parameters of this distribution depend on the applied stress. The growth of cracks is described by the Paris' equation, taking into account the experimentally confirmed correlation between the coefficients of this equation. The model assumes that each initiated crack propagates according to a random value of the Paris' equation exponent. The distribution of such a random value corresponds to a logarithmically normal law with experimentally obtained parameters. The criterion for the possible join of opposite cracks growing from adjacent holes is the uniting of plastic deformation zones at the tips of such cracks. The results of modeling are presented in the form of multiple site damage realization field of points in the coordinates of the number of cycles before the initiation of cracks vs. the number of cycles before the destruction of the bridge between holes.

Keywords


fatigue; multiple site damage; crack initiation; crack growth; numerical modeling.

References


Schijve, J. Multiple-site damage in aircraft fuselage structures, Fatig. Fract. Eng. Mater. Struc., 1995, vol. 18, iss. 3, pp. 329-344

. Pitt, S., Jones, R Multiple-site and widespread fatigue damage in aging aircraft, Engin. Fract. Mech., 1997, vol. 4, iss. 4, pp. 237-257.

Pavelko, V., Timoshtchenko, J Model of the multi-site fatigue damage in the thin-walled structure, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. «Reliability and statistics in transportation and communication» (Part 2) (Riga, Latvia, October 13–14, 2005), Riga 2005, pp. 327-334.

Ignatovich, S. R. Verojatnostnaja model' mnogoochagovogo ustalostnogo povrezhdenija (MSD) zaklepochnyh soedinenij aviacionnyh konstrukcij [Multi-site fatigue damage (MSD) probabilistic model of riveted joints in aircraft structures]. Problemy prochnosti – Strength of Materials, 2014, no. 3, pp. 48-58.

Recommendations for regulatory action to prevent widespread fatigue damage in the commercial airplane fleet: a report of the AAWG (Final Report). Airworthiness Assurance Working Group, 1999. 162 p.

Wang, H. L. and Grandt, A.F. Monte Carlo analysis of widespread fatigue damage in lap joints. Analysis of widespread fatigue damage in aerospace structures (Final report for Air Force Office of Scientific Research), prep. by A.F. Grandt, Jr., T.N. Farris, B.H. Hillberry, Purdue University Publ., 1999. 25 p.

Proppe, C. and Irving P. E. Probabilistic analysis of multi-site damage in aircraft fuselages, Comp. Mech., 2003, vol.30, no. 4, pp. 323-329.

Garcia, A. N. Lap joint MSD assessment using a probabilistic model, Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Fract. «Aeronautics & Aerospace» (Turin, Italy, March 20-25, 2005), 2005, pp. 74-79.

Cavallini, G. and Lazzeri, R. A Probabilistic approach to fatigue risk assessment in aerospace components, Eng. Frac. Mec., 2007, vol. 74, no. 18, pp. 2964-2970.

Yang, J. N. Statistical estimation of economic life for aircraft structures. Journal of Aircraft, 1980, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 528-535.

Rambalakos, A. and Deodatis, G. Non-periodic inspection of aging aircraft structures, Proc. 9th Joint FAA/DoD/NASA Conf. on Aging Aircraft (Atlanta, USA, GA, March 6–9, 2006), 2006, pp. 1-18.

Ignatovich, S. R. and Karan, Ye. V. Kynetyka rosta ustalostnikh treshchyn v obraztsakh alyumynyevoho splava D16AT s mnozhestvennymy kontsentratoramy [Fatigue crack growth kinetics in samples of D16AT aluminum alloy with multiple concentrators]. Problemy prochnosti –Strength of Materials, 2015, no. 4, pp. 91-101.

Ritchie, R. O. and Knott, J. F. Mechanisms of fatigue crack growth in low alloy steel. Acta Metallurgica, 1973, vol. 21, pp. 639-648.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2021.4sup1.08