Aerospace Technic and Technology

Considering the long negative influence of the human factor on flight safety, ICAO has been orienting the leadership and specialists of state aviation administrations and airlines to the proactive prevention of this phenomenon, demanding flight safety effective management "by indicators".
These indicators in terms of professional activity of air traffic controllers (ATC) are defined: the relation to the risk (the main decision-makers and controversial estimates of SOP's violations), levels of claims, preferences systems, and dangerous behavior strategies, operational thinking and decision making that, in contrast to formally computational methods reflect the implementation of the methodology of psychological decision theory and cognitive psychology.
The main decision-making dominants (inclination, disinclination, and indifference to risk) are revealed in the process of proactive decision by the controllers of closed decision-making tasks by constructing, with the help of special artificial lotteries and a limited number of points, the utility functions of the continuity of aircraft separation standards in the horizontal plane.
For the separation standard S = 20 km, the proportion of students-controllers (n = 128 persons) of inclined (INC), indifferent (IND) and disinclined to risk (D) was detected: INC:IND: D ↔ 5: 18: 105 ↔ 3.9%: 14.1%: 82.0% ↔ 1: 3.6: 21, which indicates their desire to avoid failures in their professional activities.
Therefore, the quantitative indicator of demonstrated risk aversion increases with the complication of the separation standard (reducing the distance between aircraft). For the separation level S = 10 km it is established: INC:IND: D ↔ 5: 8: 115 ↔ 3.9%: 6.3%: 89.8% ↔1: 3.6: 21.
In professional controllers (n = 70 persons), for the separation standard S = 20 km, the ratio of persons with different dominance of decision-making was found: IND: INC ↔ 9: 25: 36 ↔ 12.9%: 35.7%: 51.4 % ↔1: 2.8 : 4, which indicates an overwhelming demonstration of their motivation to achieve success in the same working conditions. The motivation increases with the complexity of the separation standard: for S = 10 km it is established: D: IND: INC ↔ 4: 18: 48 ↔ 5.7%: 25.7%: 68.6% ↔ 1: 4.5: 12.
It is recommended to apply the obtained results during the organization of the person-oriented training of young dispatchers aiming at developing stable skills for making rational risk decisions.

Safety Management Manual (SMM). DOC ICAO 9859, AN/474. Montreal, Canada, 2013.

Reva, A. N., Tumyishev, K. M., Bekmuhambetov A. A. Chelovecheskiy faktor i bezopasnost poletov (Proaktivnoe issledovanie vliyaniya) : monografiya [Human factor and safety (Proactive impact research) : monograph]. Almaty, 2006. 242 р.

Edvards, U. Prinyatie resheniy [Decision making]. Chelovecheskiy faktor. v 6-ti t. [Handbook of Human Factor]. V. 3. Modelirovanie deyatelnosti, profes-sionalnoe obuchenie i otbor operatorov [Modeling activities, professional training and selection of opera-tors]. Part I. Modeli psihicheskoy deyatelnosti [Models of psychophysiological activity]. Moscow. Mir Publ., 1991, pp. 5-89. (In Russian)

Hodakov, V. E., Pilipenko, N. V., Sokolova, N. A. Vstup do komp’yuternih nauk [Introduction to Computer Science]. Kiev. Tsentr navchalnoyi lіteraturi Publ., 2005. 496 p. (In Ukraine)

Herst ,R. & Herst ,L Oshibki pilota : chelovecheskiy faktor [Pilot error : the human factor]. Moscow, Transport Publ., 1986. 260 p. (Russ. ed.: A. S. Schebrov)

Ouens, Ch. A. Letnaya ekspluatatsiya (Organi-zatsiya rabotyi ekipazha) [Flight operation (crew work organization)]. Moscow, Transport Publ., 1987. 237 p. (Russ. ed.: I. M. Alyavzin)

Vyidacha svidetelstv aviatsionnomu personalu [Issuance of certificates to aviation personnel] : Prilozhenie 1 k Konventsii o mezhdunarodnoy grazhdanskoy aviatsii. Izd-e odinnadtsatoe. Monreal, Kanada, iyul 2011. (In Russian)

Fundamentalnyie kontseptsii chelovecheskogo faktora [Fundamental concepts of the human factor]. Chelovecheskiy faktor : sb. m-lov # 1. Cir. ICAO 216 AN / 131. Monreal, Kanada, 1989. 34 p. (In Russian)

PHARE Ground Human Machine Interface (GHMI) project : Summary report. EURO-CONTROL - PHARE/NLR/GHMI-7/FR/1.0/DOC 99-70-02.

The Human Factors Case : Guidance for Human Factors Integration. EUROCONTROL. Edition 1.0 / 27.08.2004.

Kozeletskiy, Yu. Psihologicheskaya teoriya resheniy [Psychological decision theory]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1979. 504 p. (In Russian)

Anderson, D. R. Kogtivnaya psihologiya [Cognitive psychology]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002. 496 p. (In Russian)

Kornilova, T. V. Psihologiya riska i pri-nyatiya resheniy [Psychology of risk and decision’s making]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 2003. 286 p. (In Russian)

Solso, R. Kognitivnaya psihologiya. 6-e izd. [Cognitive psychology. 6-th edition]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2006. 509 p. (In Russian)

Kornilova, T. V. Intellektualno-lichnostnyiy potentsial cheloveka v usloviyah neopre-delennosti i riska [Intellectual personality potential of man in the conditions of vagueness and risk]. Saint Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2016. 344 p. (In Russian)

Reva, O. M., Borsuk, S. P., Nasirov, Sh. Sh., Seleznov, G. M. Teoretychne obgruntuvannia systemno-informatsiinoi kvalimetrii liudskoho chynnyka v aeronavihatsiinykh systemakh [A theoretical grounding of system-informative qualimetry of human factor is in the aeronavigation systems]. Materiali 8 Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Suchasni enerhetychni ustanovky na transporti, tekhnolohii ta obladnannia dlia yikh obsluhovuvannia SEUTTOO-2017» [Proc. 8th International scientific-practical conference «Modern energy installations on transport, technologies and equipment for their maintenance MEITTEM-2017»]. Kherson, Kherson State Marine Academy Publ., 2017, pp. 127-132. (In Ukraine)

Reva, O. M., Muhtarov, P. Sh., Mirzo-ev, B. M. Stіykіst osnovnoyi domіnanti priynyattya rIshen aviadispetcherom v umovah riziku [Steadiness of main dominants of making decision by air traffic controller in case of risk]. Aviatsiino-kosmichna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia, 2009, no 10 (117), pp. 157-143. (In Ukraine)

Reva, O. M., Borsuk, S. P. Porivnyannya osnovnoyi dominanti priynyattya rishen studentiv aviadispetcheriv dlya riznih norm eshelonuvannya povitryanih suden [Comparison of the main dominant decision-making of students-air traffic controllers for different standards of air trains separation]. Materiali Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Mіskі і regіonalnI transportnі problemi» [Proc. International scientific-practical conference «City and regional transport problems]. Kharkiv. National University of Municipal Economy named after O. M. Beketova, 2015. Р. 37. (In Ukraine)

Reva, O. M., Seleznev, G. M. Ustalenist osnovnoi dominanty diialnosti aviadyspetchera v umovakh stokhastychnoho ryzyku [Stability of the main dominant of decision-making by an air traffic controller under conditions of stochastic risk]. Materiali konferentsii «Zastosuvannia aviatsii v narodnomu hospodarstvi». [Proc. scientific conference «Application of aviation in the national economy»]. Kirovograd, State Flight Academy Publ, 2001, pp. 129-135. (In Ukraine).