Mathematical model of pneumatic launch system with effect of unmanned aerial vehicle, engine and propeller characteristics

Olexander Khrulev

Abstract


Despite significant progress in the development of modern unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), universal launch systems are not currently used for them. In fact, each UAV project requires its own launcher, which is inefficient in many cases. To evaluate the characteristics of UAV launchers, simple methods are used at the level of analysis of acting forces, but they do not make it possible to correctly select the type and parameters of the catapult for specific tasks. The object of this study was a universal pneumatic launch system for operational-tactical UAVs. The purpose of this study is to select the design scheme and basic parameters of a universal pneumatic catapult for UAVs of the operational-tactical class. The task: to develop and numerically solve a mathematical model of a pneumatic catapult, perform an analysis of characteristics, justify the choice of a design scheme and main parameters of a pneumatic catapult when changing the initial parameters within broad limits. Method of the study. The thermodynamic method was used with the help of which the differential equations of motion of structural elements were compiled and solved for various combinations of parameters. The results. By modeling, the main characteristics of the catapult were obtained and it was shown that for the effective functioning of the launcher, no special pneumatic cylinder piston sealing is required; the air leakage through the gap is controlled due to the short process time even at high operating pressures. In addition, the permissible minimum height of the cable attachment point on the trolley above the block roller was determined below which the loads on the cable and piston increased sharply. Conclusions. The developed model confirmed the versatility of using the pneumatic launcher of the scheme under consideration for operational and operational-tactical UAVs with a take-off weight of 50 to 250 kg, and such a wide range is provided only by regulating the air pressure in the receiver and is not available for other types of systems. At the same time, if the increase in pressure is limited by safety requirements, the possibility of further increasing the takeoff weight of the UAV in the launch scheme under consideration will remain by increasing the diameter of the pneumatic cylinder.

Keywords


UAV; launch system; catapult; piston engine

References


Davis, R. L. Mechanical design and optimization of swarm-capable UAV launch systems. Thesis. Monterey, United States Naval Academy, 2015. 139 p.

Fahlstrom, P. G., Gleason, Th. J. & Sadraey, M. H. Introduction to UAV Systems. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2022. 434 p.

Barnhart, R. K. Hottman, S. B. Marshall, D. M. & Shappee E. Introduction to Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2012. 194 p.

Austin, R. Unmanned Aircraft Systems. UAVs design, development and deployment. Chichester, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 2010. 332 p.

Kondratiuk, M. & Ambroziak, L. Design and Dynamics of Kinetic Launcher for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Applied Science, 2020, vol. 10. 13 p. DOI: 10.3390/app10082949.

Bumb, N., Kalogeropoulos, X., Kelday, A., Wai, Hou, L., Xiao L., Portakalcioglu, H., Tagg, J., Tarazi, B. Catapult launcher for Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAV). Part 2. Design case study. SESM2005: Engineering Design and Structural Analysis Methods, 2012. 86 p. Available at: https://dokumen.tips/ documents /catapult-launcher-for-uav.html?page=3 (accessed 20.04.2023).

Jastrzębski, G. Impact of opening time of the take-off pneumatic launcher main valve on take-off pressure losses. Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport, 2016, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 175-182.

UKRSPECSYSTEMS Releases New UAV Bungee Catapult Launcher. UAS Weekly, 2020. Available at: https://uasweekly.com/2020/11/22/ukrspecsystems-releases-new-uav-bungee-catapult-launcher/ (accessed 20.04.2023).

Thanghom, P., Pinyochon, J., Narathee, P., Weng, S. & Surangsee, S. Spring Drive UAV Launcher. Proceedings, 2019, vol. 39, iss. 2. 6 p. DOI: 10.3390/proceedings2019039002.

Miller, B., Valoria, Ch., Warnock, C. & Coutlee, J. Lightweight UAV. Launcher Senior Project for Aerojet‐Rocketdyne. Final Report. Saint Luis, California Polytechnic State University, 2014. 232 p.

Jurczyk, K. The prospect for the launcher of a mini unmanned aerial vehicle from an unmanned surface vehicle. Scientific Journal of Polish Naval Academy, 2018, vol. 1, iss. 212, pp. 5-26. DOI: 10.2478/sjpna-2018-0001.

Pneumatic UAV launcher GLS-1A. Ukrspecsystems Ukraine. AeroExpo, 2023. Available at: https://www.aeroexpo.online/prod/ukrspecsystems/product-185884-73131.html (accessed 20.04.2023).

Gan, L., Fang, X., Zhang, Zh., Chen, H. & Wei, X. Modular Clustering of UAV Launch System Architecture Based on HDDSM. Aerospace, 2022, vol. 9, iss. 168. 18 p. DOI: 10.3390/aerospace 9030168.

Grekov, V. P. & Tkachenko, Yu. A. Rozrakhunok odnostupinchatogo pnevmatychnogo tzilindra z vbudovanym resyverom yak pryvodu yazemnoi katapulty [Calculation of a single-stage pneumatic cylinder with a built-in receiver as a ground-based drive]. Weapon systems and military equipment, 2018, vol. 1, iss. 53, pp. 91-96. DOI: 10.30748/soivt.2018.53.13.

Jastrzebski, G. & Ułanowicz, L. Estimating the Useful Energy of a Launcher’s Pneumatic Launch System UAV. Energies, 2022, vol. 15, iss. 8424. 17 p. DOI: 10.3390/en15228424.

Komandyru pidrozdilu po zastosuvannyu BPAK taktychnogo rivnya (za dosvidom provedennya OOS (ranishe ATO) [To the commander of the unit for the use of tactical-level UAC (based on the experience of carrying out OOS (formerly ATO)]. Kyiv, "Center for educational literature", 2022. 66 p.

Teoriya i praktika zastosuvannya bezpilotnykh litalnykh aparativ [Theory and practice of using unmanned aerial vehicles (drones)]. Kyiv, "LITERA", 2023. 126 p.

Lemko, O. L. & Molodchik, A. D. Aerodina¬michni ta liotno-tekhnichni kharakterystyky perspektyvnogo bezpilotnogo litalnogo aparatu skhemy "litayuche krylo" [Aerodynamic and flight technical characteristics of the promising unmanned aerial vehicle of the "flying wing" scheme]. Mechanics of gyroscopic systems, 2015, vol. 29, pp. 44-52. DOI: 10.20535/0203-377129201567172.

Lippert, D. & Spektor, J. Rolling Resistance and Industrial Wheels. Hamilton White Paper. Hamilton, HamiltonCaster.com, 2020, No. 11. 7 p.

NSK Rolling Bearings. Cat. No. E1102m. – Tokio, NSK Ltd., 2013. 283 p.

Podsedkowski, M., Konopinski, R., Obidowski, D. & Koter, K. Variable Pitch Propeller for UAV-Experimental Tests. Energies, 2020, vol. 13, iss. 5264. 16 p. DOI: 10.3390/en13205264.

Stokkermans, T. C. A. Aerodynamics of propellers in interaction dominated flowfields. An application to novel aerospace vehicles. Dissertation for the purpose of obtaining the degree of doctor at Delft University of Technology. Delft, Delft University of Technology, 2020. 244 p.

Brandt, J. B., Deters, R. W., Ananda, G. K., Dantsker, O. D. & Selig, M. S. UIUC Propeller Data Site. Department of Aerospace Engineering. Available at: https://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/props/propDB.html (accessed 20.04.2023).

Gill, R. & D’Andrea, R. Computationally Efficient Force and Moment Models for Propellers in UAV Forward Flight Applications. Drones, 2019, vol. 3, iss. 77. 47 p. DOI: 10.3390/drones 3040077.

Ercan, A. Analysis and design of a novel reciprocating compressor utilizing a minfas-tar mechanism. A Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University. Middle East Technical University, 2021. 198 p.

ldel'chik, E. Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance. Coefficients of Local Resistance and of Friction. Springfield, Israel Program for Scientific Translations Ltd., 1966. 517 p.

Lanlege, D. I., Kehinde, R., Sobanke, D. A. & Garba, U. M. Comparison of Euler and Range-Kutta methods in solving ordinary differential equations of order two and four. Leonardo Journal of Sciences, 2018, iss. 32, pp. 10-37.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2023.4sup1.06